Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA EEF

CVE-2026-74994: inets, httpd: Authentication Bypass via Directory Namespace Collapse in httpd mod_auth

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.63% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50.5% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: Erlang OTP 27.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, 29.0.6; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-6; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-6.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Erlang OTP 27.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, 29.0.6; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-6; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-6 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

The mod_auth module in OTP's inets httpd server, when configured with dets or mnesia authentication backends and multiple directory configuration blocks, collapses all directory blocks into a single shared user/group namespace. A user added to one protected directory is accepted as valid for all other protected directories on the same server instance. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.

MediumCVSS 6.0 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 1, 2026
Updated
Sep 8, 2026
EPSS
0.6% · 50th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

24

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
24 / 40 · 6.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · EEF
6.0
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-74994

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for erlang records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Erlang OTP

    • before 17.0unknown · otp
    • 17.0 and later · before 27.3.4.17affected · otp
    • 28.0 and later · before 28.5.0.6affected · otp
    • 29.0 and later · before 29.0.6affected · otp
    • before 5.10unknown · otp
    • 5.10 and later · before 9.3.2.7affected · otp
    • 9.4 and later · before 9.6.2.3affected · otp
    • 9.7 and later · before 9.7.2affected · otp
    • 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 and lateraffected · gitfixed in 6982e381137ede21a4e1faf5fa2dd82321691176, c5ccec8ed25c70ec6557fd81277e4b2f52285c19, 6101cb74ff2870718c622ba7af0c100f7f2524e3

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12erlangfrom 0—
Debian:13erlangbefore 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u41:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u4
Debian:14erlangbefore 1:29.0.6+dfsg-11:29.0.6+dfsg-1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27before 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-asn1before 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-common_testbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-compilerbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-cryptobefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-debuggerbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-dialyzerbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-diameterbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-edocbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-eldapbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-erl_interfacebefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-ertsbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-etbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-eunitbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-examplesbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-ftpbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-gdb-toolsbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-inetsbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-jinterfacebefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-kernelbefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1erlang27-megacobefore 0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1

+18

Same product

erlang: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-89422TLS 1.3 client skips server authentication when ServerHello carries an unsolicited pre_shared_key extension
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-74835inets,httpd: Memory Exhaustion via Unenforced max_body_size During Chunked Body Reception
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-71380httpd applies no timeout while receiving a request body, parking a worker on a stalled client
    34Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-73276Sep 1, 2026 · inets, httpd: HTTP Request Smuggling via Whitespace-Before-Colon Header Dropping i
    33Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-73812Sep 1, 2026 · inets, httpd: HTTP Request Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length
    33Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-75538Sep 1, 2026 · A Signed Length Overflow in Erlang/OTP's inet TCP Driver Overflows the Receive Buffer Into BEAM VM Memory From an Unauthenticated Peer
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Erlang OTP27.3.4.17Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP28.5.0.6Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP29.0.6Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP6101cb74ff2870718c622ba7af0c100f7f2524e3Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP6982e381137ede21a4e1faf5fa2dd82321691176Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.3.2.7Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.6.2.3Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.7.2Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTPc5ccec8ed25c70ec6557fd81277e4b2f52285c19Vendor (CNA)
azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.026.2.5.21-6Microsoft (MSRC)
azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-6 on Azure Linux 3.026.2.5.21-6Microsoft (MSRC)
debian:erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u4 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
debian:erlang1:29.0.6+dfsg-1 · Debian:14Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang270:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-asn10:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-common_test0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-compiler0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-crypto0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-debugger0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-dialyzer0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-diameter0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-edoc0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-eldap0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-erl_interface0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:erlang27-erts0:27.3.4.17-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-863 · Incorrect Authorization

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (5 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records