CVE-2026-73285: RustFS: OPA policy plugin omits ExistingObjectTag conditions, allowing tag-based authorization policies to treat tagged objects as untagged
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: rustfs rustfs 1.0.0-rc.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to rustfs rustfs 1.0.0-rc.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. From 1.0.0-alpha.64 until 1.0.0-rc.1, RustFS external OPA authorization enabled by RUSTFS_POLICY_PLUGIN_URL in crates/iam/src/sys.rs sets PreparedIamAuth.needs_existing_object_tag incorrectly for PreparedIamMode::Opa, causing maybe_merge_object_tag_conditions to omit s3:ExistingObjectTag/* values and allowing authenticated users to bypass tag-based policy restrictions. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0-rc.1.
- Published
- Aug 12, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 40th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-863
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
rustfs rustfs
- >= 1.0.0-alpha.64, < 1.0.0-rc.1affected
Same product
rustfs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-68926RustFS has a gRPC Hardcoded Token Authentication Bypass49Plan
- CVE-2026-45039RustFS: Internode RPC HMAC secret falls back to public default credential, enabling peer impersonation39Monitor
- CVE-2026-45043RustFS: ImportIam Allows Creation of Backdoor Service Accounts Under Any Parent Including Root37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-73265Aug 12, 2026 · RustFS: Version-specific object reads authorize the non-version action26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-73284Aug 12, 2026 · RustFS: AddServiceAccount Handler Allows Creation of Root-Parent Service Accounts35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-73286Aug 12, 2026 · RustF: Request headers can populate server-derived IAM condition keys, letting a caller satisfy identity-based policy conditions32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| rustfs rustfs | 1.0.0-rc.1 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-732860 days apartRustF: Request headers can populate server-derived IAM condition keys, letting a caller satisfy identity-based policy conditions32Monitor
- CVE-2026-732890 days apartRustFS: ForAllValues/ForAnyValue negated string conditions are transposed, inverting IAM and bucket-policy decisions32Monitor
- CVE-2026-4504276 days apartRustFS: UploadPartCopy Does Not Enforce Destination Bucket Policy on Copy Source28Monitor
- CVE-2026-732900 days apartRustFS: Anonymous ListObjectVersions bypasses RestrictPublicBuckets through the ListBucket fallback21Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-863 · Incorrect AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.