CVE-2026-70425: Dell PowerScale OneFS, Versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.7.1.0, Versions 9.8.0.0 through 9.10.1.0, and Versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.14.0.1, contain
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.53% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Dell PowerScale OneFS 9.13.1.1 or later, 9.15.0.0 or later.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Dell PowerScale OneFS 9.13.1.1 or later, 9.15.0.0 or later or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Dell PowerScale OneFS, Versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.7.1.0, Versions 9.8.0.0 through 9.10.1.0, and Versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.14.0.1, contain a command injection vulnerability. An admin privileged local attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges to root, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
- Published
- Sep 9, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 45th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · dell
- 6.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| dell | powerscale onefs | cpe:2.3:o:dell:powerscale_onefs |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- dell powerscale onefs9.5.0.0 and later · up to 9.7.1.0 inclusive
- dell powerscale onefs9.8.0.0 and later · up to 9.10.1.0 inclusive
- dell powerscale onefs9.11.0.0 and later · up to 9.14.0.1 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (dell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Dell PowerScale OneFS
- before 9.13.1.1 or lateraffected · semver
- before 9.15.0.0 or lateraffected · semver
Same product
dell: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-22278Dell PowerScale OneFS versions prior to 9.13.0.0 contains an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability.39Monitor
- CVE-2024-53298Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.0.1, contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the NFS export.39Monitor
- CVE-2025-27690Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.1.0, contains a use of default password vulnerability.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-40633Jul 15, 2026 · Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.1.7, versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.13.0.2 contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information i22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-40635Sep 9, 2026 · Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.12.0.0 through 9.13.1.0 contain an Insecure Temporary File vulnerability.21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-46460Sep 9, 2026 · Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.7.1.15, versions 9.8.0.0 through 9.13.1.0, and versions prior to 9.15.0.0, contain an Inco14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dell PowerScale OneFS | 9.13.1.1 or later | Vendor (CNA) |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS | 9.15.0.0 or later | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-1052 · Sep 10, 2026(Dell Çoklu Ürün Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.