NVD / CVE Program· CNA JFROG

CVE-2026-69104: Potential unauthorized repository migration in JFrog Artifactory

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

An authenticated user may initiate repository migration operations without required repository permissions, potentially causing information disclosure, unauthorized state changes, and service disruption. Fixed versions address the issue.

HighCVSS 7.6 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Broken access control (IDOR)

EUVD-2026-65521

Published: Aug 25, 2026
Updated: Aug 28, 2026
EPSS: 0.3% · 23th percentile
CWE: CWE-862

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 30 / 40 · 7.6 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: —
CNA · JFROG: 7.6; NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (JFROG). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

jfrog artifactory
- 7.161.0 and later · before 7.161.19affected

Same product

jfrog: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2026-82329Potential authentication bypass leading to administrative access in ArtifactoryKEV
73This week
CVE-2026-42016Incorrect authorization validation of user token in JFrog Artifactory allows Privilege EscalationKEV
68This week
CVE-2026-42018Anonymous user token generation exposure in JFrog ArtifactoryKEV
63This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2026-70547Aug 12, 2026 · Potential unauthorized metadata exposure in JFrog Artifactory
17Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2026-69106Aug 12, 2026 · Potential cache poisoning in JFrog Artifactory
35Monitor
Later →CVE-2026-70551Aug 25, 2026 · Server-Side Request Forgery Via VCS remote download in JFrog Artifactory
34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Kostya KortchinskyOpenAIfinder

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

CVE-2026-6637513 days apartLow-privilege users may remove protected Artifactory metadata
32Monitor
CVE-2026-705500 days apartPotential unauthorized access to private Composer repository metadata in JFrog Artifactory
26Monitor
CVE-2026-6875413 days apartPublishers without delete permission can overwrite docker layer information
26Monitor
CVE-2026-6875813 days apartAuthenticated users may access restricted Artifactory support information
26Monitor
CVE-2026-6910713 days apartPotential unauthorized artifact access in JFrog Artifactory
23Monitor
CVE-2026-6875313 days apartAnonymous users may access restricted Artifactory content under specific configurations
21Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).