CVE-2026-66384: Authenticated users may write data outside the intended Docker cache path
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 51/100)
- CISA has confirmed exploitation in the wild (Aug 27, 2026). Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Sep 10, 2026.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.66% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 51.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · CISA KEV · FIRST EPSS
An authenticated user may write data outside the intended Docker cache path under specific remote-repository conditions.
- Published
- Aug 12, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 51th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
51
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 30 / 30 · Listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- active
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · JFROG
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Actively exploited in the wild
CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Aug 27, 2026. That signals real attacks, not theory.
Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Sep 10, 2026.
Get told when this record changes
- In CISA KEV: exploitation in the wild confirmed
- Weaponized exploit exists
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| jfrog | artifactory | cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- jfrog artifactorybefore 7.146.35
- jfrog artifactory7.161.0 and later · before 7.161.16
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (JFROG). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
jfrog artifactory
- before 7.146.35affected
- 7.161.0 and later · before 7.161.16affected
Same product
jfrog: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-82329Potential authentication bypass leading to administrative access in ArtifactoryKEV73This week
- CVE-2026-42016Incorrect authorization validation of user token in JFrog Artifactory allows Privilege EscalationKEV68This week
- CVE-2026-42018Anonymous user token generation exposure in JFrog ArtifactoryKEV63This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-65926Aug 12, 2026 · Private Release Bundle versions may be disclosed under specific configurations12Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-66016Aug 12, 2026 · Rendered Artifactory Helm manifests may contain generated TLS private keys26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-68758Aug 12, 2026 · Authenticated users may access restricted Artifactory support information26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-08-28 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- CISA KEV+14 d
- First PoC+15 d
- TodayNov 4, 2026+84 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Kostya KortchinskyOpenAIfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-6592116 days apartPotential path traversal leading to unauthorized file writes35Monitor
- CVE-2026-663810 days apartRepository readers may access content outside configured upstream paths21Monitor
- CVE-2026-663820 days apartAuthenticated users may write files outside the intended Artifactory work directory17Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-8232916 days apartPotential authentication bypass leading to administrative access in ArtifactoryKEV73This week
- CVE-2026-420180 days apartAnonymous user token generation exposure in JFrog ArtifactoryKEV63This week
- CVE-2026-687600 days apartPotential remember-me authentication bypass in JFrog Artifactory21Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.