Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA VulnCheck

CVE-2026-64620: FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via crypto_rsa_common

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.91% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: FreeRDP FreeRDP 3.28.0.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to FreeRDP FreeRDP 3.28.0 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

FreeRDP before 3.28.0 (affected <=3.27.1) contains a heap-based buffer overflow in crypto_rsa_common() (libfreerdp/crypto/crypto.c). The function writes the modular-exponentiation result into the caller's output buffer via BN_bn2bin() and only afterward checks output_length > out_length, so out-of-bounds bytes are written before the bounds check. On the server side, when a client selects RDP Standard Security, the encrypted client random is decrypted into a fixed 32-byte buffer. Because the server publishes its RSA public key, an unauthenticated attacker can forge a ciphertext whose decrypted value is up to the full modulus length (e.g. 256 bytes for RSA-2048), overflowing the 32-byte heap buffer by up to ~224 attacker-controlled bytes pre-authentication, resulting in denial of service.

CriticalCVSS 9.3 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 20, 2026
Updated
Jul 28, 2026
EPSS
0.9% · 60th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

37

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.9%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · VulnCheck
9.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-64620

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for freerdp records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
freerdpfreerdp

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • freerdp freerdpbefore 3.28.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • FreeRDP FreeRDP

    • 3.28.0not affected
    • before 3.28.0affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10freerdpbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
AlmaLinux:10freerdp-develbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
AlmaLinux:10freerdp-libsbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
AlmaLinux:10freerdp-serverbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
AlmaLinux:10libwinprbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
AlmaLinux:10libwinpr-develbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
Debian:12freerdp2from 0—
Debian:13freerdp3from 0—
Debian:14freerdp3before 3.28.0+dfsg-13.28.0+dfsg-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdpbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-debuginfobefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-debugsourcebefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-develbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-libsbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-libs-debuginfobefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-serverbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0freerdp-server-debuginfobefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0libwinprbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0libwinpr-debuginfobefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0libwinpr-develbefore 2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.112:3.10.3-3.el10_0.11
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2freerdpbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2freerdp-debuginfobefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2freerdp-debugsourcebefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2freerdp-develbefore 2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.82:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8

+8

Same product

freerdp: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-8787FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains an Integer Overflow that leads to a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in function gdi_Bitmap_Decompress
    42Plan
  • CVE-2018-8788FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains an Out-Of-Bounds Write of up to 4 bytes in function nsc_rle_decode() that results in a memory co
    41Plan
  • CVE-2018-8786FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains an Integer Truncation that leads to a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in function update_read_bitmap_
    41Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-57158Jul 10, 2026 · FreeRDP planar_decompress_plane_rle_only: heap OOB read — incomplete fix for CVE-2026-23530
    20Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-57156Jul 10, 2026 · FreeRDP: Integer overflow leading to heap buffer overflow in Orders Delta Points parsing
    34Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-64621Jul 20, 2026 · FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Double-Free via selectedmonitors
    37Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
FreeRDP FreeRDP3.28.0Vendor (CNA)
almalinux:freerdp2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:freerdp-devel2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:freerdp-libs2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:freerdp-server2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libwinpr2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libwinpr-devel2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
debian:freerdp33.28.0+dfsg-1 · Debian:14Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-debuginfo2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-debugsource2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-devel2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-libs2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-libs-debuginfo2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-server2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:freerdp-server-debuginfo2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libwinpr2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libwinpr-debuginfo2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libwinpr-devel2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:freerdp2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.8 · Rocky Linux:10Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-31883129 days apartFreeRDP has a `size_t` underflow in ADPCM decoder leads to heap-buffer-overflow write
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-6730512 days apartFreeRDP Windows Client before 3.29.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via Cliprdr
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-31806129 days apartFreeRDP has a Heap Buffer Overflow in nsc_process_message() via Unchecked SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND Bitmap Dimensions
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4442052 days apartFreeRDP cliprdr server heap-buffer-overflow via undersized capabilitySetLength in CB_CLIP_CAPS
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4442152 days apartFreeRDP RDPGFX CacheToSurface heap-buffer-overflow via clamped-rectangle validation bypass
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2026-5715610 days apartFreeRDP: Integer overflow leading to heap buffer overflow in Orders Delta Points parsing
    34Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (1 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records