Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2026-61646: FastGPT: Shared axios SSRF guard validates only the initial URL before following redirects

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: labring FastGPT 4.15.0-beta5.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to labring FastGPT 4.15.0-beta5 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. Prior to 4.15.0-beta5, FastGPT's shared SSRF guard validates only the initial request URL before handing the request to axios, and axios follows redirects by default. An authenticated workflow user can configure an HTTP request node to call an attacker-controlled public URL that redirects to cloud metadata, loopback, or internal services that the guard would block on direct request, and the HTTP node returns the response body to the workflow caller. This issue is fixed in version 4.15.0-beta5.

MediumCVSS 6.3 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 15, 2026
Updated
Oct 24, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 30th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

25

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
6.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-61646

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for labring records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • labring FastGPT

    • < 4.15.0-beta5affected

Same product

labring: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-42302FastGPT: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via code-server Misconfiguration in agent-sandbox
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-68929FastGPT: Unauthenticated WeChat channel hijack and denial of service via shareId-only authorization
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-50562FastGPT: Untrusted PR artifacts are pushed and deployed by privileged preview workflows
    37Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-55418Jul 7, 2026 · FastGPT: S3 presign/read handlers do not bind the object key to the caller's team (cross-team file disclosure)
    34Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-61644Jul 15, 2026 · FastGPT: /api/core/chat/record/getCollectionQuote can disclose cross-tenant dataset text due to an unbound initialId lookup
    30Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-61684Jul 15, 2026 · FastGPT: Unauthenticated cross-tenant data access via forgeable plugin-invoke JWT (default INVOKE_TOKEN_SECRET='token')
    35Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
labring FastGPT4.15.0-beta5 · descriptionVendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-546078 days apartFastGPT: SSRF in HTTP-tool OpenAPI schema importer via SwaggerParser $ref (bypasses the isInternalAddress guard)
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4428547 days apartFastGPT: SSRF Protection Bypass via `externalFile` in Dataset Preview API
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4234568 days apartFastGPT: Cloud metadata endpoint SSRF protection bypass via port specification, IPv6 mapping, hex/decimal IP encoding, and trailing dot
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4428468 days apartFastGPT: Stored MCP tool URL SSRF in FastGPT workflow execution
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8430169 days apartFastGPT safe axios SSRF guard still allows DNS rebinding TOCTOU on protected outbound requests
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4428668 days apartFastGPT: SSRF Vulnerability in Laf Workflow Node via Missing Internal Address Validation
    9Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

  • CVE-2026-6892943 days apartFastGPT: Unauthenticated WeChat channel hijack and denial of service via shareId-only authorization
    37Monitor

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (1 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records