CVE-2026-61433: PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Code Injection via API deployment generator
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: MervinPraison PraisonAI 4.6.78.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to MervinPraison PraisonAI 4.6.78 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
PraisonAI before 4.6.78 fails to safely encode deployment configuration values when generating Python source code for API servers. Attackers can inject arbitrary Python expressions through the deploy.api.host and agents_file configuration parameters that execute when the generated server starts or handles requests.
- Published
- Jul 15, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 11th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 8.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
MervinPraison PraisonAI
- 4.6.78not affected
- before 4.6.78affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | praisonai | before 4.6.78 | 4.6.78 |
Same product
mervinpraison: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-61447PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via CodeAgent45Plan
- CVE-2026-48168PraisonAI: GitHub Actions Claude workflow command injection via unquoted PR branch name40Plan
- CVE-2026-57116PraisonAI: AgentOS remains unauthenticated after GHSA-pm96 patched version and allows remote agent invocation39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-61427Jul 15, 2026 · PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Authentication Bypass via HTTP-stream27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-61430Jul 15, 2026 · PraisonAI before 1.6.78 DNS Rebinding SSRF via web_crawl33Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-61435Jul 15, 2026 · PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Authentication Bypass via Host Header Spoofing35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| MervinPraison PraisonAI | 4.6.78 | Vendor (CNA) |
| PyPI:praisonai | 4.6.78 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- rexpositoryreporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-614474 days apartPraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via CodeAgent45Plan
- CVE-2026-5713161 days apartpraisonai: Jobs API exposes agent-execution endpoints with no authentication39Monitor
- CVE-2026-5714162 days apartPraisonAI: Remote Code Execution via Sandbox Escape in `codeMode` Tool39Monitor
- CVE-2026-614445 days apartPraisonAI before 4.6.78 Code Injection via f-string37Monitor
- CVE-2026-6217684 days apartPraisonAI: Code Injection via f-string Interpolation in Deploy API Server Generation36Monitor
- CVE-2026-614460 days apartPraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via Plugin Auto-Discovery34Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.