CVE-2026-55973: 'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.28% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.23.0 up to and including 1.25.1, when 'dns-error-reporting: yes' is set, the EDNS Report-Channel option (code 18) from the last upstream response is read and uses the option's length as the length of the agent domain. When a domain name check is performed on the agent domain, the returned lenght is not used and if the agent domain is followed by garbage, those bytes are moved onto the tail of the synthetic '_er.' report query name. That query name is later used in the iterator via a subquery to send out the DNS Error Report and when Unbound tries to walk that query name during 'find_closest_of_type()', it strips labels using the query name length rather than stopping at the embedded root, walks one byte past it, and feeds the first garbage byte to 'dname_query_hash()' as a label length writing over the stack variable 'labuf'. One ordinary upstream response from a delegated zone the attacker controls is sufficient to terminate the daemon.
- Published
- Jul 22, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 20th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · NLnet Labs
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| nlnetlabs | unbound | cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nlnetlabs unbound1.23.0 and later · before 1.25.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NLnet Labs). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NLnet Labs Unbound
- 1.23.0 and later · before 1.25.2affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | python3-unbound | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-anchor | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-devel | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-dracut | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-libs | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-utils | before 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | python3-unbound | before 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound | before 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-devel | before 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-dracut | before 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-libs | before 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | unbound | from 1.23.0 · before 1.25.2-r0 | 1.25.2-r0 |
| Debian:12 | unbound | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | unbound | before 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 | 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | unbound | before 1.25.2-1 | 1.25.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | unbound | before 1.25.2-160000.1.1 | 1.25.2-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | unbound | before 1.25.2-1.1 | 1.25.2-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | python3-unbound | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | python3-unbound-debuginfo | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | unbound | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | unbound-anchor | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | unbound-anchor-debuginfo | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | unbound-debuginfo | before 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 |
+27
Same product
nlnetlabs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-25042Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an out-of-bounds write via a compressed name in rdata_copy.40Plan
- CVE-2019-25039Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in respip/respip.c.40Plan
- CVE-2019-25038Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in dnscrypt/dnscrypt.c.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-55708Jul 22, 2026 · Privacy/configuration issue when adding local data in views through 'unbound-control'12Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-55717Jul 22, 2026 · 'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip' CNAME redirect could lead to a crash23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-55990Jul 22, 2026 · Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured Unbound23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs Unbound | 1.25.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 1.25.2-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:python3-unbound | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-anchor | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-devel | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-dracut | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-libs | 1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-utils | 1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:unbound | 1.25.2-r0 · Alpine:v3.22 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:unbound | 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:unbound | 1.25.2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-unbound | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-unbound-debuginfo | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor-debuginfo | 0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-debuginfo | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-debugsource | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-devel | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-devel | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-dracut | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-dracut | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs-debuginfo | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-munin | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-utils | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:unbound | 0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
+1
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.