Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch
Issue summary: Receiving a DTLS record for a future epoch while a handshake is in progress causes OpenSSL to buffer far more memory than the record itself requires. Impact summary: A peer can use a small amount of network traffic to make an OpenSSL DTLS endpoint retain a disproportionately large amount of memory, which may lead to a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) Description: While a DTLS handshake is in progress, a peer may legitimately have already moved on to the next epoch (for example, having sent its ChangeCipherSpec and Finished messages) before the local endpoint has processed the same transition, typically because of reordering on the underlying UDP transport. OpenSSL buffers such early records so that they can be processed once the local endpoint catches up. Buffering a record currently retains the entire read buffer it arrived in, which is sized to hold the largest possible DTLS record (around 16 kilobytes), rather than just the bytes that make up the record itself. Up to 100 such records may be buffered per connection. As a result, a peer that sends a stream of small forged records claiming to belong to the next epoch can cause an OpenSSL DTLS endpoint to retain around 1.7 megabytes of memory, despite sending only a small fraction of that amount of data over the network. An attacker therefore gains a memory amplification factor of around 1200, and can multiply the effect across as many associations as it is able to open, making this a remote memory exhaustion Denial of Service risk for DTLS servers. Since the memory retained per connection remains bounded, and any limit an application already places on the number of concurrent associations also bounds the total exposure, this issue has been assessed as Low severity. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.2. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.4. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.8. OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.7. OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.22. Premium support customers only: OpenSSL 1.1.1 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1zi OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2zr This issue was reported on 18 May 2026 by Amazon Web Services. The fix has been developed by Matt Caswell. -- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Amazon Web Services Fixed by: Matt Caswell
- BDU:2026-14720
- EUVD-2026-65481
- ALSA-2026:67154
- ALSA-2026:67165
- openSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21744-1
- RHSA-2026:59635
- RHSA-2026:59641
- RHSA-2026:67154
- RHSA-2026:67165
- RLSA-2026:67154
- RLSA-2026:67165
- SUSE-SU-2026:23463-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:23473-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:23512-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:23609-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:3866-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:3876-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:3877-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:3878-1
- Published
- Aug 25, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 48th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-405
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl openssl1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zr
- openssl openssl1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zi
- openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.22
- openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.7
- openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.8
- openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.4
- openssl openssl4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.2affected · semver
- 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.4affected · semver
- 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.8affected · semver
- 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.7affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.22affected · semver
- 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1ziaffected
- 1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zraffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | openssl | from 1.0.2 · before 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.22-1~deb12u1 | 3.0.22-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.5.7-1~deb13u2 | 3.5.7-1~deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | openssl | before 3.6.4-1 | 3.6.4-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | openssl-3 | before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.5.3-8.1 | 3.5.3-8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-libs-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
+29
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
- CVE-2016-2108The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denia62This week
- CVE-2016-6309statem/statem.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0a does not consider memory-block movement after a realloc call, which allows remote attackers to cause a den60This week
- CVE-2022-3786X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow58Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.22 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.4.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.5.8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.6.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 4.0.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 openssl 3.3.7-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.3.7-6 | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 openssl 3.3.7-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.3.7-6 | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.5.8-r0 · Alpine:v3.22 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.22-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.5.3-8.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-config-fips | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel-engine | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-fips-provider-upstream | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3-devel | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3-devel-engine | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3-libs | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:openssl | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 · Rocky Linux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-1_1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.63.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-3 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Amazon Web Servicesreporter
- Matt Caswellremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-405 · Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4808b5d64176451f3d93d87d0ac9c81a9b13fb23
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7110cb2f75806d0bf809eb2f90790d477900be40
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a0c8ec557d9cac078f032d76cdf684fe743eb382
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cc0c6710917cd5eec001b297355d2ba723505107
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f52ffc11b90737ac89083909618dc2e1f42c561c
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.