pypdf: Possible infinite loop when retrieving fonts for layout-mode text extraction
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: py-pdf pypdf 6.13.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to py-pdf pypdf 6.13.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.13.0, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires extracting the text in layout mode. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.13.0.
- Published
- Jun 22, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 6th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-835
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| pypdf project | pypdf | cpe:2.3:a:pypdf_project:pypdf |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- pypdf project pypdfbefore 6.13.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
py-pdf pypdf
- < 6.13.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pypdf | from 0 | — |
| Debian:12 | pypdf2 | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | pypdf | before 6.19.0-1 | 6.19.0-1 |
| PyPI | pypdf | before 6.13.0 | 6.13.0 |
Same product
pypdf project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-103000pypdf: Possible large memory usage when retrieving alphabetical page labels34Monitor
- CVE-2026-102999pypdf: Possible long runtimes with large amount of embedded files34Monitor
- CVE-2026-102998pypdf: Possible long runtimes when generating appearance streams34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-49460Jun 22, 2026 · pypdf: Inefficient decoding of FlateDecode PNG predictor streams20Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-49461Jun 22, 2026 · pypdf: Possible large memory usage for form XObjects during text extraction27Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-54531Jun 22, 2026 · pypdf: Possible infinite loop when processing outlines/bookmarks in writer27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| py-pdf pypdf | 6.13.0 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:pypdf | 6.19.0-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:pypdf | 6.13.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-5993516 days apartpypdf: Possible infinite loop for not terminated inline images (ASCII85 and ASCIIHex filter)34Monitor
- CVE-2026-545310 days apartpypdf: Possible infinite loop when processing outlines/bookmarks in writer27Monitor
- CVE-2026-546510 days apartpypdf: Possible infinite loop when processing threads/articles in writer27Monitor
- CVE-2026-8430971 days apartpypdf: Possible infinite loop for TreeObject.insert_child27Monitor
- CVE-2026-27024122 days apartpypdf has a possible infinite loop when processing TreeObject27Monitor
- CVE-2026-24688146 days apartpypdf has possible Infinite Loop when processing outlines/bookmarks20Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.