CVE-2026-5052: Vault Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in ACME Challenge Validation via Attacker-Controlled DNS
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.38% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: HashiCorp Vault 2.0.0; HashiCorp Vault Enterprise 1.19.16, 1.20.10, 1.21.5.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 5.3, NVD 8.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to HashiCorp Vault 2.0.0; HashiCorp Vault Enterprise 1.19.16, 1.20.10, 1.21.5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Vault’s PKI engine’s ACME validation did not reject local targets when issuing http-01 and tls-alpn-01 challenges. This may lead to these requests being sent to local network targets, potentially leading to information disclosure. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.0.0 and Vault Enterprise 2.0.0, 1.21.5, 1.20.10, and 1.19.16.
- Published
- Apr 17, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 31th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.6
- CNA · HashiCorp
- 5.3
- 3.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hashicorp | vault | cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- hashicorp vault1.14.0 and later · before 1.19.16
- hashicorp vault1.14.0 and later · before 2.0.0
- hashicorp vault1.20.0 and later · before 1.20.10
- hashicorp vault1.21.0 and later · before 1.21.5
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (HashiCorp). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
HashiCorp Vault
- 1.15.0 and later · before 2.0.0affected · semver
HashiCorp Vault Enterprise
- 1.15.0 and later · before 2.0.0affected · semverfixed in 1.19.16, 1.20.10, 1.21.5
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/vault | from 1.14.0 · up to and including 1.21.4 | — |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/vault | from 1.14.0 | — |
Same product
hashicorp: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-35192The official vault docker images before 0.11.6 contain a blank password for a root user.40Plan
- CVE-2024-2048Vault Cert Auth Method Did Not Correctly Validate Non-CA Certificates39Monitor
- CVE-2020-12757HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.4.0 and 1.4.1, when configured with the GCP Secrets Engine, may incorrectly generate GCP Credentials 39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-3605Apr 17, 2026 · Vault KVv2 Metadata and Secret Deletion Policy Bypass Denial-of-Service32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-4525Apr 17, 2026 · Vault Token Leaked to Backends via Authorization: Bearer Passthrough Header35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-5807Apr 17, 2026 · Vault Vulnerable to Denial-of-Service via Unauthenticated Root Token Generation/Rekey Operations30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| HashiCorp Vault | 2.0.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.19.16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.20.10 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 1.21.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| HashiCorp Vault Enterprise | 2.0.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Oleh Konko1seal, as well as Vipin Chaudhary.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.