CVE-2026-50248: BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for XFR in auth/rpz zones
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.13% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, when an auth/rpz zone has a configured primary hostname that resolves to BOGUS A/AAAA, it is still considered as a possible XFR endpoint. A malicious actor that can spoof the hostname's A/AAAA record (no valid RRSIG required) becomes the zone's XFR primary and can replaces the entire zone/the resolver's entire response policy.
- Published
- Jul 22, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 2th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-345
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · NLnet Labs
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| nlnetlabs | unbound | cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nlnetlabs unbound1.7.0 and later · before 1.25.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NLnet Labs). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NLnet Labs Unbound
- 1.7.0 and later · before 1.25.2affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.22 | unbound | from 1.7.0 · before 1.25.2-r0 | 1.25.2-r0 |
| Debian:12 | unbound | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | unbound | before 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 | 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | unbound | before 1.25.2-1 | 1.25.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | unbound | before 1.25.2-160000.1.1 | 1.25.2-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | unbound | before 1.25.2-1.1 | 1.25.2-1.1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | python3-unbound | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-anchor | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-devel | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-dracut | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-libs | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-munin | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | unbound-utils | before 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | unbound | before 1.26.1-150100.10.31.1 | 1.26.1-150100.10.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | unbound | before 1.25.2-150100.10.28.1 | 1.25.2-150100.10.28.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | unbound | before 1.26.1-150600.23.24.1 | 1.26.1-150600.23.24.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | unbound | before 1.25.2-150600.23.19.1 | 1.25.2-150600.23.19.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | unbound | before 1.26.1-159998.1.1 | 1.26.1-159998.1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | unbound | before 1.25.2-1.1 | 1.25.2-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | unbound | before 1.25.2-slfo.1.1_1.1 | 1.25.2-slfo.1.1_1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | unbound | before 1.26.1-slfo.1.1_1.1 | 1.26.1-slfo.1.1_1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | unbound | before 1.25.2-160000.1.1 | 1.25.2-160000.1.1 |
Same product
nlnetlabs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-25042Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an out-of-bounds write via a compressed name in rdata_copy.40Plan
- CVE-2019-25039Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in respip/respip.c.40Plan
- CVE-2019-25038Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in dnscrypt/dnscrypt.c.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-50046Jul 22, 2026 · Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-50243Jul 22, 2026 · 'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL25Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-50251Jul 22, 2026 · Attacker supplied '0.0.0.0'/'::' glue triggers defensive full-cache flush21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs Unbound | 1.25.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 1.25.2-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| alpine:unbound | 1.25.2-r0 · Alpine:v3.22 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:unbound | 1.26.1-0+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:unbound | 1.25.2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-unbound | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-devel | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-dracut | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-munin | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-utils | 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:unbound | 1.25.2-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-446900 days apartCross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation30Monitor
- CVE-2026-7795556 days apartPossible ZONEMD verification bypass window17Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-345 · Insufficient Verification of Data AuthenticityCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)CAPEC-111likelihood: High · High
- Cache PoisoningCAPEC-141likelihood: High · High
- DNS Cache PoisoningCAPEC-142likelihood: High · High
- Content SpoofingCAPEC-148likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML MessagesCAPEC-218Medium
- Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-MiddleCAPEC-384Low
- Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API ManipulationCAPEC-385Medium
- Application API Navigation RemappingCAPEC-386Medium
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.