CVE-2026-49951: RAGFlow < 0.27.0 SSRF via set_api_key base_url Parameter
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: infiniflow ragflow 0.27.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to infiniflow ragflow 0.27.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
RAGFlow before 0.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to force the server to issue requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints by supplying an unvalidated base_url to the POST /v1/llm/set_api_key endpoint handled by set_api_key() in api/apps/llm_app.py. Attackers can exploit this flaw to probe shared-network services such as MySQL, Elasticsearch, Redis, MinIO, the Infinity vector database, and cloud metadata endpoints, with raw upstream exception text returned in the response leaking internal service details, open ports, and configuration fingerprints.
- Published
- Nov 6, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
infiniflow ragflow
- before 0.27.0affected · semver
Same product
infiniflow: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-12433Remote Code Execution in infiniflow/ragflow40Plan
- CVE-2026-45312RAGFlow: Server-Side Template Injection in Prompt Generator leads to Remote Code Execution39Monitor
- CVE-2026-24770RAGFlow Affected by Zip Slip Remote Code Execution (RCE) in MinerUParser39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-121585Nov 4, 2026 · InfiniFlow RAGFlow Text To SQL Retrieval sql.go RunSQL authorization8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-121927Nov 4, 2026 · InfiniFlow RAGFlow Seafile Connector seafile_connector.py _account_get server-side request forgery8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-121928Nov 4, 2026 · InfiniFlow RAGFlow Images API file_utils.py cross site scripting8Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| infiniflow ragflow | 0.27.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+7 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Sheer Galorfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-7589880 days apartRAGFlow < 0.26.3 - Server-Side Request Forgery via Agent Invoke Component33Monitor
- CVE-2026-1219272 days apartInfiniFlow RAGFlow Seafile Connector seafile_connector.py _account_get server-side request forgery8Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.