Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-48856· NVD / CVE Program· CNA EEF

httpc leaks Authorization header to cross-origin redirect targets

Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerability in Erlang OTP inets (httpc_response module) allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. The httpc client forwards the Authorization and Proxy-Authorization request headers to redirect targets without checking whether the redirect crosses an origin boundary. httpc_response:redirect/2 constructs the redirected request by updating only the host field of the header record; all other fields (including authorization and proxy_authorization) are copied verbatim. The redirect target host is never compared against the original host. autoredirect defaults to true, so this affects all httpc callers that do not explicitly disable automatic redirects. An attacker who controls a server that the victim contacts via httpc can issue a cross-origin 3xx redirect to a server they also control. The Authorization header (including Basic credentials derived from URL userinfo via httpc_request:handle_user_info/2) is forwarded to the redirect target, allowing credential theft. The same applies to the Proxy-Authorization header. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/inets/src/http_client/httpc_response.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.13, OTP 28.5.0.2, and OTP 29.0.2, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.6, 9.6.2.2, and 9.7.1. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.

HighCVSS 7.1 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 10, 2026
Updated
Sep 24, 2026
EPSS
0.6% · 44th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · EEF
7.1
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
erlangerlang\/inets
erlangerlang\/otp

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • erlang erlang/inets5.10 and later · before 9.3.2.6
  • erlang erlang/inets9.6 and later · before 9.6.2.2
  • erlang erlang/inets9.7 and later · before 9.7.1
  • erlang erlang/otp17.0 and later · before 27.3.4.13
  • erlang erlang/otp28.0 and later · before 28.5.0.2
  • erlang erlang/otp29.0 and later · before 29.0.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Erlang OTP

    • 17.0 and lateraffected · otpfixed in 27.3.4.13, 28.5.0.2, 29.0.2
    • 5.10 and lateraffected · otpfixed in 9.3.2.6, 9.6.2.2, 9.7.1
    • 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 and later · before 688d748d6f7a6a06b13b662a1d3de8af97079612affected · git
    • 688d748d6f7a6a06b13b662a1d3de8af97079612 and laternot affected · git

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12erlangall versions—
Debian:13erlangbefore 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u31:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3
Debian:14erlangbefore 1:29.0.2+dfsg-11:29.0.2+dfsg-1
openSUSE:Tumbleweederlangbefore 28.5.0.4-1.128.5.0.4-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweederlang27before 27.1.3-3.127.1.3-3.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7erlangbefore 23.3.4.19-150300.3.39.123.3.4.19-150300.3.39.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7erlang26before 26.2.1-150300.7.28.126.2.1-150300.7.28.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-28808ScriptAlias CGI targets bypass directory auth in inets httpd (mod_auth vs mod_cgi path mismatch)
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-23941Request smuggling via first-wins Content-Length parsing in inets httpd
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-48858ftp client PASV response IP not validated against control peer, enabling SSRF and FTP bounce attacks
    25Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Erlang OTP27.3.4.13Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP28.5.0.2Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP29.0.2Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP688d748d6f7a6a06b13b662a1d3de8af97079612Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.3.2.6Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.6.2.2Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP9.7.1Vendor (CNA)
Debian:erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
openSUSE:erlang28.5.0.4-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
openSUSE:erlang2727.1.3-3.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
SUSE:erlang23.3.4.19-150300.3.39.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)
SUSE:erlang2626.2.1-150300.7.28.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
P
Scope
X

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records