Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2026-48759: TypeBot: Cross-Workspace Theme Template IDOR (Modification and Deletion)

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: baptisteArno typebot.io 3.16.0.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to baptisteArno typebot.io 3.16.0 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Versions 3.15.2 and below have an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability through cross-workspace Theme Template modification and deletion. The handleSaveThemeTemplate and handleDeleteThemeTemplate handlers validate that the authenticated user is a non-guest member of the provided workspaceId, but then operate on themeTemplateId via Prisma queries that do NOT include workspaceId in the WHERE clause. This allows any authenticated user to modify or delete theme templates belonging to any other workspace and may expose Template IDs via shared typebots or network traffic. This issue has been fixed in version 3.16.0.

HighCVSS 7.1 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 17, 2026
Updated
Oct 26, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 10th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
7.1
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-48759

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for baptistearno records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • baptisteArno typebot.io

    • < 3.16.0affected

Same product

baptistearno: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-33712TypeBot: Unauthenticated SSRF via isolated-vm fetch in preview chat endpoint bypasses SSRF controls
    40Plan
  • CVE-2026-48765TypeBot vulnerable to cross-workspace OAuth credential takeover in updateOAuthCredentials via missing object binding
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-47705TypeBot vulnerable to CSV injection in result export
    38Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-39969May 22, 2026 · TypeBot: WhatsApp Webhook Endpoint Missing Signature Verification
    26Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-39970May 22, 2026 · TypeBot: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via SVG File Upload On Profile Picture Form
    34Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-48764Jun 18, 2026 · TypeBot has SSRF in HTTP request and script fetch flows via DNS rebinding bypass
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
baptisteArno typebot.io3.16.0 · descriptionVendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-4876555 days apartTypeBot vulnerable to cross-workspace OAuth credential takeover in updateOAuthCredentials via missing object binding
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4770455 days apartTypeBot vulnerable to cross-typebot webhook resume via unchecked `resultId` lineage allows unauthorized control of another bot's waiting session
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4849455 days apartTypeBot vulnerable to cross-typebot WhatsApp preview webhook resume via global `wa-preview-{phone}` session ids
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-2844426 days apartTypebot: IDOR in Result Logs Endpoint Allows Cross-Workspace Data Disclosure
    26Monitor
  • CVE-2026-6286169 days apartTypeBot: Cross-tenant custom-domain removal via unbound `name` in handleDeleteCustomDomain
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2026-3996726 days apartTypeBot: Cross-Typebot Result Data Access via Missing typebotId Filter
    12Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
Low

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-639 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);res.json(invoice);

Fixed

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({  id: req.params.id,  ownerId: req.user.id,});if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);res.json(invoice);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (1 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records