CVE-2026-48524: PyJWT: PyJWKClient unbounded JWKS endpoint requests via attacker-controlled kid values (DoS)
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 14/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: jpadilla pyjwt 2.13.0; azl3 python-jwt 2.8.0-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.13.0-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to jpadilla pyjwt 2.13.0; azl3 python-jwt 2.8.0-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.13.0-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.13.0, PyJWKClient.get_signing_key() forces a fresh HTTP request to the JWKS endpoint for every JWT with an unknown kid value, with no rate limiting. Since kid comes from the unverified token header, an attacker can trigger unlimited outbound requests. The vulnerability surfaces only when a JWKS fetch fails; an attacker can attempt to provoke that with sustained unknown-kid traffic, but the outcome depends on upstream JWKS-endpoint behavior (rate limiting, transient errors) which is beyond the attacker's control. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.
- Published
- May 28, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-460
Report tools
Action score
14
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 14 / 40 · 3.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 3.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| pyjwt project | pyjwt | cpe:2.3:a:pyjwt_project:pyjwt |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- pyjwt project pyjwtbefore 2.13.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
jpadilla pyjwt
- < 2.13.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pyjwt | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | pyjwt | before 2.13.0-1 | 2.13.0-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | python-PyJWT | before 2.12.1-160000.2.1 | 2.12.1-160000.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-PyJWT | before 2.13.0-1.1 | 2.13.0-1.1 |
| PyPI | pyjwt | from 2.0.0 · before 2.13.0 | 2.13.0 |
| PyPI | pyjwt | before 2.13.0 | 2.13.0 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 | python-PyJWT | before 2.8.0-150400.8.13.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.13.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | python-PyJWT | before 2.12.1-160000.2.1 | 2.12.1-160000.2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | python-PyJWT | before 2.9.0-3.1 | 2.9.0-3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | python-PyJWT | before 2.12.1-slfo.1.1_2.1 | 2.12.1-slfo.1.1_2.1 |
Same product
pyjwt project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-102268PyJWT: Asymmetric-PEM detection bypass: whitespace/line-ending-mutated public keys skip the HS/asymmetric confusion guard36Monitor
- CVE-2026-102267PyJWT: PyJWKClient follows redirects when fetching JWKS36Monitor
- CVE-2026-102266PyJWK accepts empty HMAC keys, bypassing PyJWT's empty-key validation36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-48522May 28, 2026 · PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes16Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-48523May 28, 2026 · PyJWT: Algorithm allow-list bypass when decoding with `PyJWK` / `PyJWKClient` keys21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-48525May 28, 2026 · PyJWT: Unauthenticated DoS via unbounded Base64URL decoding of unused payload segment in b64=false detached JWS21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| jpadilla pyjwt | 2.13.0 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 python-jwt 2.8.0-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.13.0-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:pyjwt | 2.13.0-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-PyJWT | 2.13.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:pyjwt | 2.13.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:python-PyJWT | 2.12.1-slfo.1.1_2.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-460 · Improper Cleanup on Thrown ExceptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.