CVE-2026-47390: PraisonAI spider_tools SSRF protection bypass via alternate loopback host encodings
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: praisonai (PyPI) 4.6.40; praisonaiagents (PyPI) 1.6.40.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to praisonai (PyPI) 4.6.40; praisonaiagents (PyPI) 1.6.40 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.6.40 of PraisonAI, corresponding to version 1.6.40 of praisonaiagents, `spider_tools` URL validation can be bypassed using alternate loopback host encodings. The tool contains a URL validation function intended to block local or unsafe targets before fetching attacker-controlled URLs. However, the validation only blocks a small set of exact host strings such as `localhost` and `127.0.0.1`. It does not normalize hostnames, resolve DNS, parse numeric IPv4 variants, or validate the final resolved IP address before making the request. As a result, certain URLs may bypass the protection and still reach loopback services. After the weak validation passes, `scrape_page()` calls `requests.Session.get()` on the attacker-controlled URL. This allows an attacker who can influence URLs passed to `scrape_page`, `crawl`, or `extract_text` to induce SSRF requests against loopback-only services. This is a server-side request forgery protection bypass. PraisonAI version 4.6.40 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.40 contain a patch.
- Published
- Jul 21, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 22, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 7th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
22
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 5.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
MervinPraison PraisonAI
- < 4.6.40affected
MervinPraison praisonaiagents
- < 1.6.40affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | praisonai | before 4.6.40 | 4.6.40 |
| PyPI | praisonaiagents | before 1.6.40 | 1.6.40 |
Same product
mervinpraison: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-61447PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via CodeAgent45Plan
- CVE-2026-48168PraisonAI: GitHub Actions Claude workflow command injection via unquoted PR branch name40Plan
- CVE-2026-57116PraisonAI: AgentOS remains unauthenticated after GHSA-pm96 patched version and allows remote agent invocation39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-61443Jul 15, 2026 · PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via SkillTools34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-61446Jul 15, 2026 · PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via Plugin Auto-Discovery34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-47392Jul 21, 2026 · PraisonAI vulnerable to sandbox escape via `print.__self__` builtins module leak in `execute_code` (subprocess mode)39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PyPI:praisonai | 4.6.40 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:praisonaiagents | 1.6.40 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-5712655 days apartpraisonaiagents: SSRF guard validates literal IPs only and never resolves DNS34Monitor
- CVE-2026-614306 days apartPraisonAI before 1.6.78 DNS Rebinding SSRF via web_crawl33Monitor
- CVE-2026-6142910 days apartPraisonAI before 1.6.78 SSRF via Crawl4AI Chromium backend33Monitor
- CVE-2026-5552315 days apartPraisonAI has a`web_crawl` SSRF protection bypass via unchecked redirect targets30Monitor
- CVE-2026-5552535 days apartPraisonAI: SSRF via redirect-following in praisonaiagents web_crawl30Monitor
- CVE-2026-6009111 days apartPraisonAI before 4.6.78 Unauthenticated SSRF via webhook_url27Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.