NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2026-45722: Nextcloud: Tables app allows limited SQLi in ORDER BY with malicious sort order argument for Table Views

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
No fixed version is recorded, but the references include a patch (commit or PR) link.

Low priority for now. See the fix and affected versions sections below.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 0.9.0 to before 0.9.7, and 1.0.0 to before 1.0.2, a missing sanitization in the Tables app allowed a user with access to the tables app to perform a limited SQL injection in the ORDER BY statement of a query. Compared to normal SQL injections, the ORDER BY is limited to extracting a single bit of information per request or to make the database wait for a given time. This issue has been patched in versions 0.9.7 and 1.0.2.

HighCVSS 7.1 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

SQL injection

Published: Jun 1, 2026
Updated: Jul 22, 2026
EPSS: 0.3% · 23th percentile
CWE: CWE-89

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: —
CNA · GitHub_M: 7.1; NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
nextcloud	tables	cpe:2.3:a:nextcloud:tables

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

nextcloud tables0.9.0 and later · before 0.9.7
nextcloud tables1.0.0 and later · before 1.0.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

nextcloud security-advisories
- >= 0.9.0, < 0.9.7, >= 1.0.0, < 1.0.2affected

Same product

nextcloud: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2026-45545Nextcloud: SQL Injection in Column Type Parameter Allows Arbitrary SQL Execution
32Monitor
CVE-2024-52511Nextcloud Tables has an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Tables
26Monitor
CVE-2025-66513Nextcloud Tables app share information not limited to relevant users
21Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2025-66553Dec 5, 2025 · Nextcloud Tables app allowed users to view columns metadata information of any table
17Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2026-45544Jun 1, 2026 · Nextcloud: Information Disclosure of view filter metdata via Broken Sensitive Data Masking in ViewService
17Monitor
Later →CVE-2026-82983Oct 27, 2026 · The Tables app's share-listing endpoint (GET /apps/tables/share/table/{tableId}) did not verify that the requesting user has manage-level pe
13Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

nextcloud/tablesPR 2186

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

CVE-2026-455450 days apartNextcloud: SQL Injection in Column Type Parameter Allows Arbitrary SQL Execution
32Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
A low-privileged account is enough.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: none
Availability: low · the service can be disrupted

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: Low
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: None
Availability impact: Low

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The query text is built by concatenating user input. The database cannot tell where the data ends and the command begins.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-89 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1const owner = req.query.owner;
2const rows = await db.query(
3  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = '" + owner + "'"
4);

Fixed

1const owner = req.query.owner;
2const rows = await db.query(
3  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = $1",
4  [owner]
5);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

github.com/nextcloud/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-5h2w-c7px-hp4j

Show all references (2 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records