CVE-2026-43969: Cookie Request Header Injection via Unvalidated Encoder in cow_cookie:cookie/1
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.14% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ninenines cowlib 2.21.0, c17fd73945ef536cccecc492d286fb6b6d1c3307; azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-9 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.13.7-10.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ninenines cowlib 2.21.0, c17fd73945ef536cccecc492d286fb6b6d1c3307; azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-9 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.13.7-10 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') vulnerability in ninenines cowlib allows HTTP request splitting and cookie smuggling via unvalidated cookie name and value fields. cow_cookie:cookie/1 in cowlib builds a client-side Cookie: request header from a list of name-value pairs without validating either field. An attacker who controls the cookie names or values passed to this function can inject ;, ,, CR, LF, or TAB characters into the serialized header. This enables two classes of attack: cookie smuggling within a single header (e.g. injecting ; admin=1 to introduce a phantom cookie that the receiving server treats as authentic) and HTTP request header splitting (injecting CRLF to append arbitrary headers or smuggle a complete second request against a shared upstream proxy). The decoder side (parse_cookie_name/1, parse_cookie_value/1) and setcookie/3 already validate and reject these characters; the encoder alone is missing the check. This issue affects cowlib: from 2.9.0 before 2.21.0.
- Published
- May 11, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 3th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-93
Report tools
Action score
8
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · EEF
- 2.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ninenines | cowlib | cpe:2.3:a:ninenines:cowlib |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ninenines cowlib2.9.0 and later · up to 2.16.1 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ninenines cowlib
- 2.9.0 and later · before 2.21.0affected · semver
- f017f8a0ecbffd5033d9ab49bf180186f7a523a7 and later · before c17fd73945ef536cccecc492d286fb6b6d1c3307affected · git
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hex | cowlib | from 2.9.0 · before 2.21.0 | 2.21.0 |
| Hex | cowlib | from 2.9.0 · up to and including 2.16.1 | — |
Same product
ninenines: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-59248Unbounded HPACK/QPACK prefixed-integer decoding in Cowlib causes memory-exhaustion DoS34Monitor
- CVE-2026-7790Unbounded chunk-size hex digits in cowlib cause quadratic CPU and memory DoS34Monitor
- CVE-2026-43970Decompression Bomb in cow_spdy:inflate/2 Allows Memory Exhaustion via Crafted SPDY Frame32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-43968May 11, 2026 · CR Injection in SSE Encoder Enables Event Splitting via cow_sse:event/125Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-43966Jun 8, 2026 · HTTP Response Splitting via Non-VCHAR Bytes in cow_http_struct_hd:escape_string/225Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-43971Aug 18, 2026 · Link Header Directive Smuggling via Unescaped target/rel/Attribute Keys in cow_link:link/125Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ninenines cowlib | 2.21.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| ninenines cowlib | c17fd73945ef536cccecc492d286fb6b6d1c3307 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-9 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.13.7-10 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Hex:cowlib | 2.21.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Peter Ullrichfinder
- Loïc Hoguinremediation developer
- Jonatan Männchen / EEFcoordinator
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-439680 days apartCR Injection in SSE Encoder Enables Event Splitting via cow_sse:event/125Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-93 · Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.