CVE-2026-42795: Symlink Following in Hex Package Export Allows Embedding Files Outside Project Root
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.19% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Gleam Gleam 1.17.0, 6435a5528b9ae0449e2f32be579641ec485f6866, v1.17.0-elixir.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Gleam Gleam 1.17.0, 6435a5528b9ae0449e2f32be579641ec485f6866, v1.17.0-elixir or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Symlink following vulnerability in Gleam's Hex package export allows files outside the project root to be embedded in the generated package tarball. The file collection helpers (gleam_files, native_files, private_files) in compiler-cli/src/fs.rs use follow_links(true) when walking publishable directories such as src/ and priv/. The collected paths are added to the package archive via add_path_to_tar in compiler-cli/src/publish.rs without verifying that the resolved target remains within the project root. A symlink placed under a publishable directory will cause gleam export hex-tarball or gleam publish to embed the contents of the symlink target into the generated Hex package. An attacker with write access to the project repository can place a symlink in src/ or priv/ pointing to an arbitrary file. When a maintainer or CI pipeline runs gleam publish or gleam export hex-tarball, local files readable by the publisher (such as secrets, tokens, or SSH keys) are silently embedded into the published package artifact. This issue affects Gleam from 0.10.0-rc1 until 1.17.0.
- Published
- Jun 2, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 6, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 9th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-59
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · EEF
- 5.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Gleam Gleam
- 0.10.0-rc1 and later · before 1.17.0affected · semver
- 0.10.0-rc1 and later · before 1.17.0affected · semver
- c82a2d83bd0c06cafdc196820deb3f89a9b3ff7c and later · before 6435a5528b9ae0449e2f32be579641ec485f6866affected · git
- v0.10.0-rc1-elixir and later · before v1.17.0-elixiraffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-erlang and later · before v1.17.0-erlangaffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-node and later · before v1.17.0-nodeaffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-node-slim and later · before v1.17.0-node-slimaffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-elixir-slim and later · before v1.17.0-elixir-slimaffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-erlang-slim and later · before v1.17.0-erlang-slimaffected · other
- v0.10.0-rc1-erlang-alpine and later · before v1.17.0-erlang-alpineaffected · other
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | gleam | before 1.17.0-bp160.1.1 | 1.17.0-bp160.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | gleam | before 1.17.0-1.1 | 1.17.0-1.1 |
Same product
gleam: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-103061Path traversal in Gleam via unvalidated package application names23Monitor
- CVE-2026-43965Path Traversal in build/packages/packages.toml Allows Arbitrary Directory Deletion22Monitor
- CVE-2026-32685Path Traversal in gleam docs build via documentation.pages Allows Arbitrary File Read and Write18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Gleam Gleam | 1.17.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | 6435a5528b9ae0449e2f32be579641ec485f6866 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-elixir | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-elixir-alpine | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-elixir-slim | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-erlang | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-erlang-alpine | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-erlang-slim | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-node | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-node-alpine | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-node-slim | Vendor (CNA) |
| Gleam Gleam | v1.17.0-scratch | Vendor (CNA) |
| opensuse:gleam | 1.17.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Louis Pilfoldremediation developer
- Aly (spect3r1)finder
- Abdelrahman Ahmed Aboelkasem (0x2face)finder
- Jonatan Männchen / EEFanalyst
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- A
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-59 · Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML SmugglingT1027.006
- Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded PayloadsT1027.009
- Boot or Logon Autostart Execution:Shortcut ModificationT1547.009
- Hide Artifacts: Resource ForkingT1564.009
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow: Services File Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.