CVE-2026-42784: Sequoia-openpgp: sequoia-openpgp: cryptographic integrity compromise via key flag confusion
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.31% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.15.0.aks0-23; azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-23 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.15.0.aks0-23.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.15.0.aks0-23; azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-23 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.15.0.aks0-23 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity.
- Published
- Sep 16, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.4
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Confidential Compute Attestation
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
- 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Cost Management On-Premise 1
- 1791460851 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:1.10.2.1-1.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:1.4.0.1-2.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Hardened Images
- 0.3.2-4.hum1 and laternot affected · rpm
- 1.10.3-0.3.hum1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsunknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | rpm-sequoia | before 1.10.2.1-1.el10_2 | 1.10.2.1-1.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | rpm-sequoia-devel | before 1.10.2.1-1.el10_2 | 1.10.2.1-1.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | sequoia-sq | before 1.4.0.1-2.el10_2 | 1.4.0.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | sequoia-sqv | before 1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 | 1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | rpm-sequoia | before 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 | 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | rpm-sequoia-devel | before 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 | 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 |
| Debian:12 | rust-sequoia-openpgp | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | rust-sequoia-openpgp | before 2.2.0-2 | 2.2.0-2 |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | ansible-core | before 1:2.16.19-1.el8ap | 1:2.16.19-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | automation-controller | before 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap | 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | automation-controller-cli | before 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap | 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | python3.12-urllib3 | before 0:2.7.0-1.el8ap | 0:2.7.0-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | receptor | before 0:1.6.6-1.el8ap | 0:1.6.6-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8 | receptorctl | before 0:1.6.6-1.el8ap | 0:1.6.6-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9 | ansible-core | before 1:2.16.19-1.el9ap | 1:2.16.19-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9 | automation-controller | before 0:4.6.30-2.el9ap | 0:4.6.30-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9 | automation-controller-cli | before 0:4.6.30-2.el9ap | 0:4.6.30-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9 | receptor | before 0:1.6.6-1.el9ap | 0:1.6.6-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9 | receptorctl | before 0:1.6.6-1.el9ap | 0:1.6.6-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | automation-controller | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | automation-controller-cli | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | python3.12-urllib3 | before 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap | 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | ansible-test | before 1:2.16.19-1.el8ap | 1:2.16.19-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-controller-server | before 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap | 0:4.6.30-2.el8ap |
+76
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-90954Busybox: busybox: dpkg-deb extraction-root escape via per-ar-member deferred symlink flush31Monitor
- CVE-2026-96512Sudo: sudo: tz environment variable allows bypass of notbefore/notafter time-based authorization31Monitor
- CVE-2026-78410Util-linux: util-linux: restricted bind mounts do not pin the source, allowing x-mount.owner/group/mode redirection31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-18495Sep 11, 2026 · Libtiff: libtiff: heap-buffer overflow via numeric truncation in the jpeg raw passthrough24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-85013Sep 15, 2026 · Environment-modules: command injection in environment-modules bash completion via malicious module names containing shell metacharacters29Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-76781Sep 17, 2026 · Libxml2: libxml2: null pointer dereference parsing nextcatalog without catalog attribute22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.15.0.aks0-23 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 kata-containers-cc 3.15.0.aks0-23 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.15.0.aks0-23 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:rpm-sequoia | 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:rpm-sequoia-devel | 1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:sequoia-sq | 1.4.0.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:sequoia-sqv | 1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:rust-sequoia-openpgp | 2.2.0-2 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-cli | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-server | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-ui | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-venv-tower | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-platform-ui | 0:2.6.10-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-sequoia | 0:0.3.2-4.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pyjwt | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pyjwt+crypto | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia-debuginfo | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia-debugsource | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-urllib3 | 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rpm-sequoia | 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rpm-sequoia-debuginfo | 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rpm-sequoia-devel | 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-podman-sequoia | 0:0.3.2-4.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-rpm-sequoia | 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-rpm-sequoia-debugsource | 0:1.10.2.1-1.el9_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-sequoia-sq | 0:1.4.0.1-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-sequoia-sqv | 0:1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-sequoia-sqv-debugsource | 0:1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:sequoia-sqv | 0:1.3.0.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42078
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42902
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76733
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76734
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76735
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76737
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:79357
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:94791
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42784
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2464122
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.