Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

CVE-2026-42768: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt()

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 14/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.80% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 56.8% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.4.6, 3.5.7, 3.6.3; azl3 openssl 3.3.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-3.
  • Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.4.6, 3.5.7, 3.6.3; azl3 openssl 3.3.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-3 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME messages and observe the error code and/or decryption output. Impact summary: The Bleichenbacher-style attack allows an attacker to use the victim's vulnerable application as a way to decrypt or sign messages with the victim's private RSA key. The attack is possible in 2 variants. 1. The decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is used without providing the recipient certificate. In this case OpenSSL iterates over every KeyTransRecipientInfo (KTRI) without stopping at the first success. An attacker who authors a message with two KTRI entries — the first one wrapping a real CEK under the victim's public key, the second with an arbitrary probe ciphertext — obtains opportunity to iterate the 2nd KTRI to get a valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if the error code of the application is available. That is a Bleichenbacher oracle (Bleichenbacher, CRYPTO '98): an adaptive-chosen-ciphertext side channel from which the attacker decrypts any RSA ciphertext to the victim's key or forges any PKCS#1 v1.5 signature under it. 2. When the decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is provided with the recipient certificate, and the recipient is not found, a random key is substituted. An attacker who authors a message and is able to compare both error code and the result of the decryption, can mount a Bleichenbacher oracle. We are not aware of any applications that provide a remote attacker an opportunity to mount an attack described in these scenarios. We consider the existence of such application very unlikely, and for this reason this CVE has been evaluated as Low severity. To avoid these attacks, when RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Key Transport is in use, the invoked EVP_PKEY_decrypt() will use the implicit rejection mechanism described in draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-guidance. In previous OpenSSL releases the implicit rejection was explicitly disabled. The implicit rejection mechanism always returns a plaintext value, the symmetric key. This result is deterministic for the ciphertext and the private key. The length of the decryption result can happen to match the length of the key of the symmetric cipher that was used for the content encryption. When a certificate is not provided, the last RecipientInfo producing a key that looks valid will be used. It may cause getting garbage content on decryption. As a proper way to deal with this a recipient certificate has to be provided to identify the particular RecipientInfo for decryption. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as CMS and S/MIME processing happens outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

LowCVSS 3.7 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 23, 2026
EPSS
0.8% · 56th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

14

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
14 / 40 · 3.7 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.8%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-42768

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6
  • openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7
  • openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3
  • openssl openssl4.0.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.1affected · semver
    • 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3affected · semver
    • 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7affected · semver
    • 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10opensslbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.11:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.11:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.11:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.11:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1
AlmaLinux:9opensslbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
Alpine:v3.21opensslfrom 3.4.0 · before 3.3.7-r13.3.7-r1
Alpine:v3.22opensslfrom 3.4.0 · before 3.5.7-r03.5.7-r0
Debian:13opensslbefore 3.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u2
Debian:14opensslbefore 3.6.3-13.6.3-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0openssl-3before 3.5.0-160000.8.13.5.0-160000.8.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-3before 3.5.3-6.13.5.3-6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2opensslbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el10_21:3.5.5-4.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-4.el9_81:3.5.5-4.el9_8

+78

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-42766Jun 9, 2026 · Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption
    23Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-42767Jun 9, 2026 · NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption
    23Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-42769Jun 9, 2026 · Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.4.6Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.5.7Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.6.3Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL4.0.1Vendor (CNA)
azl3 openssl 3.3.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.03.3.7-3 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
almalinux:openssl1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-devel1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-libs1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-perl1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
alpine:openssl3.3.7-r1 · Alpine:v3.21Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl3.5.6-1~deb13u2 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-33.5.3-6.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:chunkah0:0.6.0-3.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debugsource1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl30:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl3-devel0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python-cryptography0:50.0.0-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python3-cryptography0:50.0.0-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:openssl1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Rocky Linux:10Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-33.5.0-160000.8.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
low · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
Low
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-514 · Covert Channel

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records