Heap buffer overflow in gawk
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: gawk (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.1-1.hum1, 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1; gawk-all-langpacks (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.1-1.hum1, 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1; gawk-devel (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1, 0:5.4.1-1.hum1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to gawk (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.1-1.hum1, 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1; gawk-all-langpacks (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.1-1.hum1, 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1; gawk-devel (Red Hat:hummingbird:1) 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1, 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Integer overflow vulnerability has been found in "builtin.c" program file of gawk (do_sub() routine). This issue could be used to overwrite gawk heap metadata and objects causing the program to crash. It affects 32-bit builds of gawk in versions 5.4.0 and below.
- Published
- Jul 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 13, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 10th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · CERT-PL
- 5.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fossies | gawk | cpe:2.3:a:fossies:gawk |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fossies gawkup to 5.4.0 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (CERT-PL). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GNU gawk
- up to and including 5.4.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | gawk | from 0 | — |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk | before 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 | 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk | before 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-all-langpacks | before 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 | 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-all-langpacks | before 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-devel | before 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-devel | before 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 | 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-doc | before 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 | 0:5.4.1-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | gawk-doc | before 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 |
Same product
fossies: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-40553Stack-based buffer overflow in gawk20Monitor
- CVE-2026-40467Use after free in gawk20Monitor
- CVE-2026-40468Heap buffer overflow in gawk8Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:gawk | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gawk-all-langpacks | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gawk-devel | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gawk-doc | 0:5.4.0-3.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-404680 days apartHeap buffer overflow in gawk8Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.