Plane: ORM Field Reference Injection via `segment` Parameter in Saved Analytics
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: makeplane plane 1.3.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to makeplane plane 1.3.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Plane is an open-source project management tool. In versions 1.3.0 and below, SavedAnalyticEndpoint passes the user-controlled segment query parameter directly to a Django F() expression without validation (unlike the regular AnalyticsEndpoint, which checks against an allowlist), causing ORM Field Reference Injection. An authenticated workspace MEMBER can send GET /api/workspaces/<slug>/saved-analytic-view/<analytic_id>/ with a crafted segment value that is forwarded into build_graph_plot() and traverses foreign-key relationships (e.g. workspace__owner__password) before being projected via .values("dimension", "segment"), returning the referenced field values directly in the JSON response. This exposes sensitive data such as bcrypt password hashes, API tokens, and related users' email addresses, making it a stronger primitive than the related order_by injection where values are only leaked through ordering. This issue has been fixed in version 1.3.1.
- Published
- May 20, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 33th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-943
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| plane | plane | cpe:2.3:a:plane:plane |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- plane planebefore 1.3.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
makeplane plane
- < 1.3.1affected
Same product
plane: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-30242Plane: SSRF via Incomplete IP Validation in Webhook URL Serializer34Monitor
- CVE-2026-46558Plane: Cross-workspace asset authorization bypass lets any authenticated user read, copy, delete, and overwrite assets in other Plane workspaces33Monitor
- CVE-2026-39843Plane has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Favicon Fetching30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-39374Apr 7, 2026 · Plane IDOR: Cross-Project Issue Date Modification via Bulk Update Endpoint30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-27949Apr 7, 2026 · Plane Exposes User Email (PII and part of credential) in GET Parameter17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-10850Jun 17, 2026 · Plane 1.3.1 - Stored XSS in intake issue description_html27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| makeplane plane | 1.3.1 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-943 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query LogicCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.