CVE-2026-34535: iccDEV: SEGV in CIccTagArray::Cleanup()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.16% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: InternationalColorConsortium iccDEV 2.3.1.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to InternationalColorConsortium iccDEV 2.3.1.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, a crafted ICC profile can trigger a segmentation fault (SEGV) in CIccTagArray::Cleanup(). The issue is observable under UBSan/ASan as misaligned member access / misaligned pointer loads followed by an invalid read leading to process crash when running iccRoundTrip on a malicious profile. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.
- Published
- Mar 31, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 5th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-122
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.5
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.2
- 0.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| color | iccdev | cpe:2.3:a:color:iccdev |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- color iccdevbefore 2.3.1.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
InternationalColorConsortium iccDEV
- < 2.3.1.6affected
Same product
color: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-21679iccDEV has heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability in CIccLocalizedUnicode::GetText()39Monitor
- CVE-2026-21675iccDEV has a Use After Free vulnerability in CIccCmm class via improper hint manager object deletion39Monitor
- CVE-2026-24412iccDEV has Heap Buffer Overflow in icCurvesFromXml()35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34533Mar 31, 2026 · iccDEV: UB in CIccCalculatorFunc::ApplySequence()22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34534Mar 31, 2026 · iccDEV: HBO in CIccMpeSpectralMatrix::Describe()22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34536Mar 31, 2026 · iccDEV: SO in SIccCalcOp::ArgsUsed()22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| InternationalColorConsortium iccDEV | 2.3.1.6 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-2167684 days aparticcDEV has a Heap-based Buffer Overflow in its CIccMBB::Validate() function35Monitor
- CVE-2026-2485263 days aparticcDEV has a heap-buffer-overflow in icXmlParseTextString()32Monitor
- CVE-2026-3179621 days aparticcDEV has a heap-based buffer overflow in icCurvesFromXml()31Monitor
- CVE-2026-2150483 days apartHeap Buffer Overflow in iccDEV ToneMap Parser31Monitor
- CVE-2026-2148684 days apartUse After Free and Heap-based Buffer Overflow and Integer Overflow or Wraparound and Out-of-bounds Write in iccDEV31Monitor
- CVE-2026-2149084 days aparticcDEV has heap buffer overflow in CIccTagLut16::Validate()28Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.