CVE-2026-34182: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 64.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.21, 3.4.6, 3.5.7; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-18; azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-2.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.21, 3.4.6, 3.5.7; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-18; azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
- ALSA-2026:25237
- ALSA-2026:25239
- openSUSE-SU-2026:11023-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21005-1
- RHSA-2026:25237
- RHSA-2026:25239
- RHSA-2026:42825
- RHSA-2026:55543
- RHSA-2026:59635
- RHSA-2026:59641
- RHSA-2026:62562
- RHSA-2026:62563
- RHSA-2026:62790
- RHSA-2026:67551
- RHSA-2026:71542
- RHSA-2026:83617
- RHSA-2026:84572
- RHSA-2026:84573
- RLSA-2026:25237
- RLSA-2026:25239
- Published
- Jun 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.0% · 64th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-354
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.21
- openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6
- openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7
- openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3
- openssl openssl4.0.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.1affected · semver
- 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3affected · semver
- 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7affected · semver
- 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.21affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | openssl | from 3.0.0 · before 3.3.7-r1 | 3.3.7-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | openssl | from 3.0.0 · before 3.5.7-r0 | 3.5.7-r0 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 | 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.5.6-1~deb13u2 | 3.5.6-1~deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | openssl | before 3.6.3-1 | 3.6.3-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | openssl-3 | before 3.5.0-160000.8.1 | 3.5.0-160000.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.5.3-6.1 | 3.5.3-6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 | 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
+96
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34180Jun 9, 2026 · Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34181Jun 9, 2026 · PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys29Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34183Jun 9, 2026 · Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.21 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.4.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.5.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.6.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 4.0.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-18 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.3.7-2 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 (includes 15.0 - 15.8) | 15.9.83 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 version 16.11 (includes 16.0 - 16.10) | 16.11.60 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 | 17.14.40 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 version 18.9 | 18.9.3 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.3.7-r1 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.5.3-6.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:chunkah | 0:0.6.0-3.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debugsource | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl3-devel | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-cryptography | 0:50.0.0-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-cryptography | 0:50.0.0-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Asim Viladi Oglu Manizadareporter
- Ying Dongreporter
- Haiyang Huangreporter
- Neil Hormanremediation developer
- Alex Gaynor (Anthropic)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-7580377 days apartAEAD Forgeries with Empty Ciphertext When Using EVP_Cipher()36Monitor
- CVE-2026-341810 days apartPKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys29Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-0355 · Jun 10, 2026(OpenSSL Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-354 · Improper Validation of Integrity Check ValueCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/439ed7d2c0962ce964482727264668bf277c333f
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7947e6a81eb8776802f159fb6762cb7fcf7e34c7
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9fd97f8cfdc2c0be214998de3b2b55c8edf6c7ac
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d2ca86bcd43e4f17d899f347101766b6107676e0
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.