CVE-2026-34177: VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Canonical lxd 5.0.7, 5.21.5, 6.8.0.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Canonical lxd 5.0.7, 5.21.5, 6.8.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.
- Published
- Apr 9, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 31th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-184
Report tools
Action score
36
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · canonical
- 9.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| canonical | lxd | cpe:2.3:a:canonical:lxd |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (canonical). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Canonical lxd
- 4.12.0 and later · before 5.0.7affected · semver
- 5.1.0 and later · before 5.21.5affected · semver
- 6.0.0 and later · before 6.8.0affected · semver
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical lxd4.12 and later · up to 5.0.6 inclusive
- canonical lxd5.21.0 and later · up to 5.21.4 inclusive
- canonical lxd6.0 and later · up to 6.7 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | lxd | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | incus | before 6.0.2-1 | 6.0.2-1 |
| Debian:13 | lxd | before 5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u5 | 5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u5 |
| Go | github.com/canonical/lxd | from 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e | — |
| Go | github.com/canonical/lxd | from 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e · up to and including 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
Same product
canonical: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-112816Improper certificate validation in the HTTPS listener in LXD40Plan
- CVE-2026-87799Arbitrary file write on LXD host via symlink in migration stream39Monitor
- CVE-2026-85526Path traversal via Btrfs optimized-backup subvolumes[].path enables root file/dir manipulation in LXD39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-3351Mar 3, 2026 · Authorization Bypass in LXD GET /1.0/certificates Endpoint8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-28384Mar 12, 2026 · Authenticated RCE via unsanitized compression_algorithm37Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34178Apr 9, 2026 · Importing a crafted backup leads to project restriction bypass36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical lxd | 5.0.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical lxd | 5.21.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical lxd | 6.8.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:incus | 6.0.2-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:lxd | 5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u5 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Miha Purgfinder
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-0096 · Apr 9, 2026(Canonical LXD Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-184 · Incomplete List of Disallowed InputsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Flash InjectionCAPEC-182likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input FiltersCAPEC-3likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-71likelihood: Medium · High
- User-Controlled FilenameCAPEC-73likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.