CVE-2026-34044: Coolify: Cross-team IDOR in logs component (resource lookup not team-scoped)
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: coollabsio coolify 4.0.0-beta.466.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to coollabsio coolify 4.0.0-beta.466 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.466, the Logs::mount() component looks up resources by UUID without scoping the lookup to the current team, allowing an authenticated user to access logs for applications owned by other teams by supplying a victim resource UUID. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.466.
- Published
- Jul 7, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
coollabsio coolify
- < 4.0.0-beta.466affected
Same product
coollabsio: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-34038Coolify authenticated remote command injection leading to RCE and secret exfiltration40Plan
- CVE-2026-34048Coolify: Missing authorization on terminal websocket bootstrap routes allows low-privileged members to execute commands on team servers39Monitor
- CVE-2026-34047Coolify: WebSocket Endpoint Access Control Flaw Leading to Remote Code Execution39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34035Jul 7, 2026 · Coolify: Host RCE via Log Drain secret/env command injection35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34037Jul 7, 2026 · Cross-Tenant Resource Cloning via Broken Object-Level Authorization in cloneTo()39Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34057Jul 7, 2026 · Coolify: Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Command Injection in Database Import Container Name35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| coollabsio coolify | 4.0.0-beta.466 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-340370 days apartCross-Tenant Resource Cloning via Broken Object-Level Authorization in cloneTo()39Monitor
- CVE-2026-574988 days apartCoolify Cross-Team IDOR: Livewire Components Accept Unscoped server_id and destination_uuid — Deploy to Other Teams' Servers38Monitor
- CVE-2026-345928 days apartCoolify: Cross-Team IDOR via Unscoped Server and Project Lookups Exposes SSH Keys and Infrastructure30Monitor
- CVE-2026-341671 days apartCoolify: Cross-tenant activity log disclosure via unlocked Livewire property in ActivityMonitor20Monitor
- CVE-2026-278817 days apartCoolify: Cross-team deployment information disclosure via GET /api/v1/deployments/{uuid} (IDOR)20Monitor
- CVE-2026-278837 days apartCoolify: IDOR in Deployment API - Cross-Team Deployment Information Disclosure20Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.