CVE-2026-33413: etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: azl3 etcd 3.5.21-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.5.28-1; cbl2 etcd 3.5.21-4 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.5.28-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 etcd 3.5.21-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.5.28-1; cbl2 etcd 3.5.21-4 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.5.28-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, unauthorized users may bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients. In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints; call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service; use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership; and/or trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and/or require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.
- Published
- Mar 26, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 17th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-862
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| etcd | etcd | cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- etcd etcdbefore 3.4.42
- etcd etcd3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.28
- etcd etcd3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.9
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
etcd-io etcd
- >= 3.6.0-alpha.0, < 3.6.9, >= 3.5.0-alpha.0, < 3.5.28, < 3.4.42affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | etcd | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | etcd | before 3.5.16-11 | 3.5.16-11 |
| Go | go.etcd.io/etcd | from 0 | — |
| Go | go.etcd.io/etcd | up to and including 3.3.27 | — |
| Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | from 3.5.0-alpha.0 · before 3.5.28 | 3.5.28 |
| Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | from 3.6.0-alpha.0 · before 3.6.9 | 3.6.9 |
| Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | before 3.4.42 | 3.4.42 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | flannel | before 0.28.4-1.1 | 0.28.4-1.1 |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | collectd-sensubility | before 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost | 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | collectd-sensubility-debuginfo | before 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost | 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-asn1 | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-asn1-debuginfo | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-compiler | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-crypto | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-crypto-debuginfo | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-debuginfo | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-debugsource | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-eldap | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-erl_interface-debuginfo | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-erts | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-erts-debuginfo | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-hipe | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
| Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | erlang-inets | before 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost | 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost |
+44
Same product
etcd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-28235Authentication vulnerability found in Etcd-io v.3.4.10 allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the debug function.39Monitor
- CVE-2018-16886etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control 33Monitor
- CVE-2026-59818etcd: gRPC client listener does not enforce `--client-crl-file` certificate revocation32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-34038Aug 22, 2023 · Etcd v3.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function PageWriter.write in pagewriter.go.31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-33343Mar 26, 2026 · etcd: Nested etcd transactions bypass RBAC authorization checks26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-44283May 14, 2026 · etcd: Read access via PrevKv in etcd transactions may bypass RBAC authorization checks17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 etcd 3.5.21-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.5.28-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 etcd 3.5.21-4 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 3.5.28-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:etcd | 3.5.16-11 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | 3.4.42 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | 3.5.28 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | 3.6.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:flannel | 0.28.4-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:collectd-sensubility | 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:collectd-sensubility-debuginfo | 0:0.2.1-1.1.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:etcd | 0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost · Red Hat:openstack:17.1::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:etcd-debuginfo | 0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost · Red Hat:openstack:17.1::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:etcd-debugsource | 0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost · Red Hat:openstack:17.1::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openstack-keystone | 1:16.0.3-2.20260616134936.9d699a7.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openstack-nova | 1:20.6.2-2.20260317135026.8a24acd.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openstack-nova-api | 1:20.6.2-2.20260317135026.8a24acd.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-pyasn1 | 0:0.4.6-4.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-keystone | 1:16.0.3-2.20260616134936.9d699a7.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-pyasn1 | 0:0.4.6-4.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-pyasn1-modules | 0:0.4.6-4.el8ost · Red Hat:openstack:16.2::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-862 · Missing AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.