Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-33232· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

AutoGPT: Unauthenticated DoS via Disk Space Exhaustion

AutoGPT is a workflow automation platform for creating, deploying, and managing continuous artificial intelligence agents. Versions 0.4.2 through 0.6.51 are vulnerable to an unauthenticated Denial of Service (DoS) through the server due to uncontrolled disk space consumption. The download_agent_file endpoint creates persistent temporary files for every request but fails to delete them after they are served. An unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly call this endpoint to exhaust the server's disk space, causing the database or other system services to fail due to "No space left on device" errors, rendering the entire AutoGPT Platform backend unavailable to all users. This issue has been patched in version 0.6.52.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 18, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 41th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Significant-Gravitas AutoGPT

    • >= 0.4.2, < 0.6.52affected

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-55237AutoGPT SignUp Page has DOM-Based XSS and Open Redirect
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2026-56663AutoGPT: SSRF-to-RCE Chain in `SendWebRequestBlock` via IP validation bypass and internal `pg-meta` access
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-32437AutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in MediaDurationBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-32424AutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in ScreenshotWebPageBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-32422AutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in FileStoreBlock with StepThroughItemsBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-32392AutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in LoopVideoBlock
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Significant-Gravitas AutoGPT0.6.52 · descriptionVendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-3239231 days apartAutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in LoopVideoBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-3242231 days apartAutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in FileStoreBlock with StepThroughItemsBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-3242431 days apartAutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in ScreenshotWebPageBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2025-3243731 days apartAutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in MediaDurationBlock
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-3323537 days apartAutoGPT: Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion in text templating features
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-3243631 days apartAutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in AddAudioToVideoBlock
    28Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records