Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2026-32695: Traefik has Knative Ingress Rule Injection that Allows Host Restriction Bypass

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.47% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 (Go) 3.7.0-ea.2, 3.6.11; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1; traefik (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.6.12-1.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 (Go) 3.7.0-ea.2, 3.6.11; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1; traefik (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.6.12-1.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to versions 3.6.11 and 3.7.0-ea.2, Traefik's Knative provider builds router rules by interpolating user-controlled values into backtick-delimited rule expressions without escaping. In live cluster validation, Knative `rules[].hosts[]` was exploitable for host restriction bypass (for example `tenant.example.com`) || Host(`attacker.com`), producing a router that serves attacker-controlled hosts. Knative `headers[].exact` also allows rule-syntax injection and proves unsafe rule construction. In multi-tenant clusters, this can route unauthorized traffic to victim services and lead to cross-tenant traffic exposure. Versions 3.6.11 and 3.7.0-ea.2 patch the issue.

MediumCVSS 6.3 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 27, 2026
Updated
Jul 15, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 40th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

25

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
6.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-32695

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for traefik records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
traefiktraefik

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • traefik traefikbefore 3.6.11
  • traefik traefik3.7.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • traefik traefik

    • < 3.6.11, >= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.0-ea.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefikfrom 0—
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v2from 0—
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v2up to and including 2.11.42—
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3from 3.7.0-ea.1 · before 3.7.0-ea.23.7.0-ea.2
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v3before 3.6.113.6.11
openSUSE:Leap 15.6govulncheck-vulndbbefore 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.10.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedtraefikbefore 3.6.12-1.13.6.12-1.1

Same product

traefik: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-85595Traefik before v2.11.55 and v3.0.0 through v3.7.10 Authentication Bypass via digestAuth
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2026-88877Traefik v3.7.0 Authentication Bypass via from-to-www-redirect
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-88007Traefik HTTP/3 Backend NTLM Connection Reuse
    36Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-32305Mar 20, 2026 · Traefik mTLS bypass via fragmented ClientHello SNI extraction failure
    31Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-32595Mar 20, 2026 · Traefik: BasicAuth Middleware Timing Attack Allows Username Enumeration
    25Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-33433Mar 27, 2026 · Traefik Vulnerable to BasicAuth/DigestAuth Identity Spoofing via Non-Canonical headerField
    20Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Go:github.com/traefik/traefik/v33.6.11Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/traefik/traefik/v33.7.0-ea.2Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:traefik3.6.12-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-2977716 days apartTraefik has a kubernetes gateway rule injection via unescaped backticks in HTTPRoute match values
    24Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (5 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records