Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA NLnet Labs

CVE-2026-32665: Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to `quic-size` budget bypass

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.28% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.2; azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.25.2-1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.22.0 up to and including 1.25.1, when downstream DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) is enabled, the first two bidirectional streams on a new QUIC connection (stream_id 0 and 4) bypass the per-stream 'quic-size' gate entirely, and large input buffers are allocated later, after only the 2-byte length prefix has been received from the initial streams. As a result, a remote client can make Unbound exceed the configured 'quic-size' limit with low-cost input. Using only one connection and two streams, each sending a declared 65535-byte length prefix and then holding the streams open, a client can already trivially make Unbound roughly allocate double that amount. This is a remote availability issue / memory-accounting bypass in the downstream DoQ implementation that leads to denial of service for new DoQ clients. This vulnerability needs Unbound to be compiled with DoQ support ('--with-libngtcp2') and the 'quic-port' to be configured for the listening interfaces.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 22, 2026
Updated
Oct 24, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 20th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · NLnet Labs
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-32665

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
nlnetlabsunbound

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • nlnetlabs unbound1.22.0 and later · before 1.25.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NLnet Labs). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • NLnet Labs Unbound

    • 1.22.0 and later · before 1.25.2affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12unboundfrom 0—
Debian:13unboundbefore 1.26.1-0+deb13u11.26.1-0+deb13u1
Debian:14unboundbefore 1.25.2-11.25.2-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0unboundbefore 1.25.2-160000.1.11.25.2-160000.1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedunboundbefore 1.25.2-1.11.25.2-1.1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1python3-unboundbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unboundbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-anchorbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-develbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-dracutbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-libsbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-muninbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1unbound-utilsbefore 0:1.25.2-0.1.hum10:1.25.2-0.1.hum1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0unboundbefore 1.25.2-1.11.25.2-1.1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1unboundbefore 1.25.2-slfo.1.1_1.11.25.2-slfo.1.1_1.1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2unboundbefore 1.25.2-160000.1.11.25.2-160000.1.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2019-25042Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an out-of-bounds write via a compressed name in rdata_copy.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2019-25039Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in respip/respip.c.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2019-25038Unbound before 1.9.5 allows an integer overflow in a size calculation in dnscrypt/dnscrypt.c.
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-44390May 20, 2026 · Unbounded name compression in certain cases causes degradation of service
    27Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-44608May 20, 2026 · Use after free and crash under special conditions in RPZ code
    18Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-40691Jul 22, 2026 · Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
NLnet Labs Unbound1.25.2Vendor (CNA)
azl3 unbound 1.25.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.01.25.2-1 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
debian:unbound1.26.1-0+deb13u1 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:unbound1.25.2-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:python3-unbound0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-anchor0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-devel0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-dracut0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-libs0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-munin0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:unbound-utils0:1.25.2-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
suse:unbound1.25.2-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records