CVE-2026-32624: xrdp: Heap buffer overflow in xrdp_sec_process_logon_info() via incorrect g_strncat length calculation
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: neutrinolabs xrdp 0.10.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to neutrinolabs xrdp 0.10.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
xrdp is an open source RDP server. Versions through 0.10.5 contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in its logon processing. In environments where domain_user_separator is configured in xrdp.ini, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted, excessively long username and domain name to overflow the internal buffer. This can corrupt adjacent memory regions, potentially leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or unexpected behavior. The domain_name_separator directive is commented out by default, systems are not affected by this vulnerability unless it is intentionally configured. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6.
- Published
- Apr 17, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 35th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-122
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| neutrinolabs | xrdp | cpe:2.3:a:neutrinolabs:xrdp |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- neutrinolabs xrdpbefore 0.10.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
neutrinolabs xrdp
- < 0.10.6affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.23 | xrdp | before 0.10.6-r0 | 0.10.6-r0 |
| Debian:12 | xrdp | before 0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3 | 0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3 |
| Debian:13 | xrdp | before 0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2 | 0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | xrdp | before 0.10.6-1 | 0.10.6-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | xrdp | before 0.9.27-2.1 | 0.9.27-2.1 |
Same product
neutrinolabs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-41252xrdp: lib_palette_update Heap Buffer Overflow & RCE39Monitor
- CVE-2025-68670xrdp improperly checks bounds of domain string length, which leads to Stack-based Buffer Overflow39Monitor
- CVE-2024-39917xrdp allows an ininite number of login attempts39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-32107Apr 17, 2026 · xrdp: Fail-open privilege drop in sesexec — child processes may execute as root if setuid fails35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-32623Apr 17, 2026 · xrdp: Heap buffer overflow in NeutrinoRDP channel reassembly30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-33516Apr 17, 2026 · xrdp: Pre-authentication out-of-bounds reads in RDP capability and channel parsers30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| neutrinolabs xrdp | 0.10.6 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:xrdp | 0.10.6-r0 · Alpine:v3.23 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:xrdp | 0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:xrdp | 0.9.27-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-4125294 days apartxrdp: lib_palette_update Heap Buffer Overflow & RCE39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4417894 days apartxrdp: Channel Data Forwarding Fixed-Size Buffer Overflow35Monitor
- CVE-2026-355120 days apartxrdp: Heap buffer overflow in EGFX channel34Monitor
- CVE-2026-326230 days apartxrdp: Heap buffer overflow in NeutrinoRDP channel reassembly30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.