CVE-2026-27962: Authlib JWS JWK Header Injection: Signature Verification Bypass
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.55% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: authlib authlib 1.6.9.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to authlib authlib 1.6.9 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.9, a JWK Header Injection vulnerability in authlib's JWS implementation allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWT tokens that pass signature verification. When key=None is passed to any JWS deserialization function, the library extracts and uses the cryptographic key embedded in the attacker-controlled JWT jwk header field. An attacker can sign a token with their own private key, embed the matching public key in the header, and have the server accept the forged token as cryptographically valid — bypassing authentication and authorization entirely. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.9.
- Published
- Mar 16, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 10, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 46th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 9.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| authlib | authlib | cpe:2.3:a:authlib:authlib |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- authlib authlibbefore 1.6.9
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
authlib authlib
- < 1.6.9affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | python-authlib | before 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 | 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | python-authlib | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | python-authlib | before 1.6.9-1 | 1.6.9-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-Authlib | before 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 | 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | python-Authlib | before 1.5.2-bp160.3.1 | 1.5.2-bp160.3.1 |
| PyPI | authlib | before 1.6.9 | 1.6.9 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 | python-Authlib | before 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 | 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 |
Same product
authlib: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-104056Authlib version 1.7.2 and below contains a vulnerability where discovery JSON metadata is cached without validation or issuer-origin binding39Monitor
- CVE-2026-96760Authlib library contains a signature‑verification bypass vulnerability39Monitor
- CVE-2026-116672Authlib RFC 7592 examples omit registration-access-token client binding35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-68158Jan 8, 2026 · Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-28802Mar 6, 2026 · Authlib: Setting `alg: none` and a blank signature appears to bypass signature verification30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-28490Mar 16, 2026 · Authlib Vulnerable to JWE RSA1_5 Bleichenbacher Padding Oracle33Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| authlib authlib | 1.6.9 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:python-authlib | 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-Authlib | 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:authlib | 1.6.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:python-Authlib | 1.3.1-150600.3.17.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-2880210 days apartAuthlib: Setting `alg: none` and a blank signature appears to bypass signature verification30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.6.9
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48085
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5665
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7314
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27962
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448164
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-27962.json
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.