CVE-2026-27855: Dovecot OTP authentication is vulnerable to replay attack under specific conditions.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 23/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.31% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: dovecot (Alpine:v3.23) 2.4.3-r0; dovecot (Debian:12) 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1-2.1+deb12u2; dovecot (Debian:13) 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-6+deb13u4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to dovecot (Alpine:v3.23) 2.4.3-r0; dovecot (Debian:12) 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1-2.1+deb12u2; dovecot (Debian:13) 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-6+deb13u4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Dovecot OTP authentication is vulnerable to replay attack under specific conditions. If auth cache is enabled, and username is altered in passdb, then OTP credentials can be cached so that same OTP reply is valid. An attacker able to observe an OTP exchange is able to log in as the user. If authentication happens over unsecure connection, switch to SCRAM protocol. Alternatively ensure the communcations are secured, and if possible switch to OAUTH2 or SCRAM. No publicly available exploits are known.
- Published
- Mar 27, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-294
Report tools
Action score
23
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 23 / 40 · 5.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.9
- CNA · OX
- 6.8
- 0.9 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| dovecot | dovecot | cpe:2.3:a:dovecot:dovecot |
| open-xchange | dovecot | cpe:2.3:a:open-xchange:dovecot |
Using dovecot? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Email server)
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (OX). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Open-Xchange GmbH OX Dovecot Pro
- up to and including 2.3.0affected · semver
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- dovecot dovecotbefore 2.4.3
- open-xchange dovecotup to 2.3.0 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.23 | dovecot | before 2.4.3-r0 | 2.4.3-r0 |
| Debian:12 | dovecot | before 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1-2.1+deb12u2 | 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1-2.1+deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | dovecot | before 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-6+deb13u4 | 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-6+deb13u4 |
| Debian:14 | dovecot | before 1:2.4.3+dfsg1-1 | 1:2.4.3+dfsg1-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | dovecot24 | before 2.4.3-160000.1.1 | 2.4.3-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | dovecot24 | before 2.4.3-1.1 | 2.4.3-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | dovecot23 | before 2.3.21.1-150200.76.1 | 2.3.21.1-150200.76.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | dovecot24 | before 2.4.3-160000.1.1 | 2.4.3-160000.1.1 |
Same product
dovecot: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-11500In Dovecot before 2.2.36.4 and 2.3.x before 2.3.7.2 (and Pigeonhole before 0.5.7.2), protocol processing can fail for quoted strings.58Plan
- CVE-2020-7046lib-smtp in submission-login and lmtp in Dovecot 2.3.9 before 2.3.9.3 mishandles truncated UTF-8 data in command parameters, as…45Plan
- CVE-2016-8652The auth component in Dovecot before 2.2.27, when auth-policy is configured, allows a remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash)…37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-0394Mar 27, 2026 · When dovecot has been configured to use per-domain passwd files, and they are placed one path component above /etc, or slash has been added…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-24031Mar 27, 2026 · Dovecot SQL based authentication can be bypassed when auth_username_chars is cleared by admin.32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-27856Mar 27, 2026 · Doveadm credentials are verified using direct comparison which is susceptible to timing oracle attack.23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:dovecot | 2.4.3-r0 · Alpine:v3.23 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:dovecot | 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1-2.1+deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:dovecot24 | 2.4.3-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:dovecot23 | 2.3.21.1-150200.76.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:dovecot24 | 2.4.3-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-294 · Authentication Bypass by Capture-replayCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Session SidejackingCAPEC-102likelihood: High · High
- KerberoastingCAPEC-509High
- Remote Services with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-555Very High
- Windows Admin Shares with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-561
- Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)CAPEC-60likelihood: High · High
- Use of Captured Hashes (Pass The Hash)CAPEC-644likelihood: Medium · High
- Use of Captured Tickets (Pass The Ticket)CAPEC-645likelihood: Low · High
- Use of Known Kerberos CredentialsCAPEC-652likelihood: Medium · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Remote ServicesT1021
- Remote Services:SMB/Windows Admin SharesT1021.002
- Email Collection:Remote Email CollectionT1114.002
- External Remote ServicesT1133
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The HashT1550.002
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The TicketT1550.003
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Adversary-in-the-MiddleT1557
- Steal or Forge Kerberos TicketsT1558
- Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets:KerberoastingT1558.003
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.