CVE-2026-27558: Command Injection in /index.php/attached_devices_tab/ajax_remove_uploaded_iodd_files
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 87% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CEI8M1IO 1.7.4; Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CPN8M1IO 1.7.4; Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CEI8RPIO 1.7.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CEI8M1IO 1.7.4; Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CPN8M1IO 1.7.4; Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CEI8RPIO 1.7.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A low-privileged remote attacker can exploit a command injection vulnerability in the /index.php/attached_devices_tab/ajax_remove_uploaded_iodd_files endpoint using operator credentials allowing execution of commands with root privileges on the device.
- Published
- Sep 16, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 18, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.9% · 87th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · CERTVDE
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (CERTVDE). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CEI8M1IO
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CPN8M1IO
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CEI8RPIO
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CPN8RPIO
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-G65L-V1D
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-K45P-RJ45
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-K45S-RJ45
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL1-G65L-V1D
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-G65L-V1D
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-G65L-V1D-Y
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-K45P-RJ45
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-K45S-RJ45
- 1.0.0 and later · before 1.7.4affected · semver
Same product
pepperl+fuchs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-27565Remote code execution via uploading a malicious IODD file39Monitor
- CVE-2026-27546Authentication Bypass in _account_log39Monitor
- CVE-2026-27559Command Injection via GET in /api/status/data36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-27556Sep 16, 2026 · Local File Inclusion in /index.php/ajax/save_iodd_parameters35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-27557Sep 16, 2026 · Path Traversal in /index.php/view_uploaded_iodd_file30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-27560Sep 16, 2026 · Command Injection via DELETE in /api/status/data29Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CEI8M1IO | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Carlo Gavazzi Automation YL212CPN8M1IO | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CEI8RPIO | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Carlo Gavazzi Automation YN115CPN8RPIO | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-G65L-V1D | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-K45P-RJ45 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL-K45S-RJ45 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE2-8IOL1-G65L-V1D | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-G65L-V1D | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-G65L-V1D-Y | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-K45P-RJ45 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL-K45S-RJ45 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Pepperl+Fuchs ICE3-8IOL1-G65L-V1D | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Phoenix Contact IOL MA8 EIP DI8 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Phoenix Contact IOL MA8 PN DI8 | 1.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Luca BorzacchielloNozomi Networksfinder
- Gabriele QuagliarellaNozomi Networksfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-275650 days apartRemote code execution via uploading a malicious IODD file39Monitor
- CVE-2026-275480 days apartCommand Injection in /index.php/ajax/get_iodd_port_info36Monitor
- CVE-2026-275500 days apartCommand Injection in Field_Shadow_Password Class36Monitor
- CVE-2026-275510 days apartCommand Injection in /index.php/ajax/parameterManage36Monitor
- CVE-2026-275490 days apartCommand Injection in /index.php/attached_devices_tab/do_upload36Monitor
- CVE-2026-275470 days apartCommand Injection in /index.php/ajax/get_iodd_menu_info36Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-275460 days apartAuthentication Bypass in _account_log39Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.