Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2026-27204: Wasmtime WASI implementations are vulnerable to guest-controlled resource exhaustion

MediumCVSS 6.9 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: wasmtime (crates.io) 24.0.6, 36.0.6, 40.0.4; rust-wasmtime (Debian:14) 36.0.6+dfsg-1; zed (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 1.24.2-1.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to wasmtime (crates.io) 24.0.6, 36.0.6, 40.0.4; rust-wasmtime (Debian:14) 36.0.6+dfsg-1; zed (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 1.24.2-1.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to versions 24.0.6, 36.0.6, 4.0.04, 41.0.4, and 42.0.0, Wasmtime's implementation of WASI host interfaces are susceptible to guest-controlled resource exhaustion on the host. Wasmtime did not appropriately place limits on resource allocations requested by the guests. This serves as a Denial of Service vector. Wasmtime 24.0.6, 36.0.6, 40.0.4, 41.0.4, and 42.0.0 have all been released with the fix for this issue. These versions do not prevent this issue in their default configuration to avoid breaking preexisting behaviors. All versions of Wasmtime have appropriate knobs to prevent this behavior, and Wasmtime 42.0.0-and-later will have these knobs tuned by default to prevent this issue from happening. There are no known workarounds for this issue without upgrading. Embedders are recommended to upgrade and configure their embeddings as necessary to prevent possibly-malicious guests from triggering this issue.

Published
Feb 24, 2026
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 35th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

27

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
27 / 40 · 6.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
6.9
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-27204

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits every 10 minutes on paid plans, on the hour on the free plan.

Your free account also gets you

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools, at most 30 a day (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools
Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
bytecodealliancewasmtime

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • bytecodealliance wasmtime

    • < 24.0.6, >= 25.0.0, < 36.0.6, >= 37.0.0, < 40.0.4, >= 41.0.0, < 41.0.4affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
crates.iowasmtimefrom 0.0.0-0 · before 24.0.624.0.6
crates.iowasmtimefrom 25.0.0 · before 36.0.636.0.6
crates.iowasmtimefrom 37.0.0 · before 40.0.440.0.4
crates.iowasmtimefrom 41.0.0 · before 41.0.441.0.4
crates.iowasmtimebefore 24.0.624.0.6
Debian:13rust-wasmtimefrom 0—
Debian:14rust-wasmtimebefore 36.0.6+dfsg-136.0.6+dfsg-1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedzedbefore 1.24.2-1.11.24.2-1.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-115893Wasmtime: Cranelift backend on aarch64 can jump to incorrect target on large Wasm `br_table` instruction
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-115889Wasmtime: Bit-packing in Cranelift compiler causes silent overflow and miscompilation
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2022-39394wasmtime_trap_code C API function has out of bounds write vulnerability
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-24116Jan 27, 2026 · Wasmtime segfault or unused out-of-sandbox load with f64.copysign operator on x86-64
    16Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-27195Feb 24, 2026 · Wasmtime is vulnerable to panic when dropping a `[Typed]Func::call_async` future
    27Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-27572Feb 24, 2026 · Wasmtime can panic when adding excessive fields to a `wasi:http/types.fields` instance
    27Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
crates.io:wasmtime24.0.6Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime36.0.6Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime40.0.4Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime41.0.4Package registry (OSV)
debian:rust-wasmtime36.0.6+dfsg-1 · Debian:14Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:zed1.24.2-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-115388240 days apartWasmtime before 36.0.16, 37.0.0 before 48.0.3, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 Memory Exhaustion DoS via wasmtime-wasi-http Outgoing Body Write
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2026-115390240 days apartWasmtime 47.0.0 before 48.0.3 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 Fuel Accounting Bypass DoS
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2026-54786127 days apartWasmtime: Leak in WASIp1 `fd_renumber` implementation
    9Monitor

Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · public bounty program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
P
Scope
X

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

References

All records