CVE-2026-25699: Apache Answer: Authorization Bypass in Timeline API
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Apache Software Foundation Apache Answer 2.0.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Apache Software Foundation Apache Answer 2.0.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.0. Timeline-related APIs lacked proper authorization checks, allowing regular authenticated users to access deleted, private, or unapproved content and its revision history. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.1, which fixes the issue.
- Published
- Jun 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-359
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | answer | cpe:2.3:a:apache:answer |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache answerbefore 2.0.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (apache). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Apache Software Foundation Apache Answer
- up to and including 2.0.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/apache/answer | before 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b | 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b |
| Go | github.com/apache/incubator-answer | before 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b | 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-22393Apache Answer: Pixel Flood Attack by uploading the large pixel file37Monitor
- CVE-2026-60053Apache Answer: Residual Administrative API Key Access After Role or Account Revocation36Monitor
- CVE-2026-60023Apache Answer: Unauthorized disclosure of deleted or pending answer content30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-24735Feb 4, 2026 · Apache Answer: Revision API Improper Access Control leads to Information Disclosure30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-25688Jun 9, 2026 · Apache Answer: XSS in AI Answer Rendering24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-33582Jun 9, 2026 · Apache Answer: Uploading specially crafted TIFF files causes an Out-of-Memory error26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation Apache Answer | 2.0.1 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| Go:github.com/apache/answer | 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/apache/incubator-answer | 1.7.2-0.20260206073245-92994b49976b | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Sho OdagiriGMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc.reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-24735125 days apartApache Answer: Revision API Improper Access Control leads to Information Disclosure30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-359 · Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.