Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 74.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the map filename field during the map upload action of the parameters route.
- Published
- Feb 26, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.5% · 74th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · icscert
- 8.0
- 0.8 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| copeland | xweb 300d pro firmware | cpe:2.3:o:copeland:xweb_300d_pro_firmware |
| copeland | xweb 300d pro | cpe:2.3:h:copeland:xweb_300d_pro |
| copeland | xweb 500d pro firmware | cpe:2.3:o:copeland:xweb_500d_pro_firmware |
| copeland | xweb 500d pro | cpe:2.3:h:copeland:xweb_500d_pro |
| copeland | xweb 500b pro firmware | cpe:2.3:o:copeland:xweb_500b_pro_firmware |
| copeland | xweb 500b pro | cpe:2.3:h:copeland:xweb_500b_pro |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- copeland xweb 300d pro firmwareup to 1.12.1 inclusive
- copeland xweb 500b pro firmwareup to 1.12.1 inclusive
- copeland xweb 500d pro firmwareup to 1.12.1 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (icscert). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Copeland Copeland XWEB 300D PRO
- up to and including 1.12.1affected
Copeland Copeland XWEB 500B PRO
- up to and including 1.12.1affected
Copeland Copeland XWEB 500D PRO
- up to and including 1.12.1affected
Same product
copeland: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-20797Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro Stack-based Buffer Overflow39Monitor
- CVE-2026-21718Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm39Monitor
- CVE-2026-3037Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-20742Feb 26, 2026 · Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-20910Feb 26, 2026 · Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-21389Feb 26, 2026 · Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Amir Zaltzman and Noam MosheClaroty Team82 reported this vulnerability to CISA.finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-207640 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-237020 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-244520 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-250370 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-251050 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-251960 days apartCopeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection36Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.