CVE-2026-20500: In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01810811; Issue ID: MSV-9232.
- Published
- Sep 7, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 2, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 2th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
20
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| mediatek | mt2716 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt2716_firmware |
| mediatek | mt2716 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt2716 |
| mediatek | mt6835 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt6835_firmware |
| mediatek | mt6835 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt6835 |
| mediatek | mt6858 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt6858_firmware |
| mediatek | mt6858 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt6858 |
| mediatek | mt6878 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt6878_firmware |
| mediatek | mt6878 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt6878 |
| mediatek | mt6881 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt6881_firmware |
| mediatek | mt6881 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt6881 |
| mediatek | mt6897 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:mediatek:mt6897_firmware |
| mediatek | mt6897 | cpe:2.3:h:mediatek:mt6897 |
and 32 more
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (MediaTek). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
MediaTek, Inc. MediaTek chipset
- MT2716, MT6835, MT6858, MT6878, MT6881, MT6897, MT6899, MT6982VB, MT6986, MT6988, MT6991, MT6993 … (+10)affected
Affected versions · NVD (20)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- mediatek mt2716 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6835 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6858 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6878 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6881 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6897 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6899 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6982vb firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6986 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6988 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6991 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt6993 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8668 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8676 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8678 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8755 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8775 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8792 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8793 firmwareall versions
- mediatek mt8863 firmwareall versions
Same product
mediatek: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-20520In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check.30Monitor
- CVE-2026-20526In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check.28Monitor
- CVE-2026-68589In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check.26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-20503Sep 6, 2026 · In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to a missing bounds check.21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-20525Oct 5, 2026 · In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation.21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-20527Oct 5, 2026 · In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to a missing bounds check.21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- CVSS5.5 → 5
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.