Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA cisco

CVE-2026-20348: ClamAV XAR File Format Processing Memory Corruption Vulnerability

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.71% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 54.3% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: azl3 clamav 1.5.3-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.5.4-1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 clamav 1.5.3-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.5.4-1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A vulnerability in the XAR file format parser of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition or possibly other expanded impacts as a result of memory corruption on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper boundary checks for content in XAR files during scanning. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted file that contains XAR content to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the ClamAV scanning process to terminate, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected software.

Published
Aug 7, 2026
Updated
Oct 23, 2026
EPSS
0.7% · 54th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · cisco
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-20348

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits every 10 minutes on paid plans, on the hour on the free plan.

Your free account also gets you

  • CVE alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools, at most 30 a day (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
ciscosecure endpoint

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Cisco Cisco Secure Endpoint

    • 7.0.5, 6.2.19, 7.3.3, 7.2.13, 6.1.5, 6.3.1, 6.2.5, 7.3.5, 6.2.1, 7.2.7, 7.1.1, 6.3.5 … (+28)affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.24clamavbefore 1.4.6-r01.4.6-r0
Debian:12clamavbefore 1.4.6+dfsg-0+deb12u11.4.6+dfsg-0+deb12u1
Debian:13clamavfrom 0—
Debian:14clamavbefore 1.4.6+dfsg-11.4.6+dfsg-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0clamavbefore 1.5.4-160000.1.11.5.4-160000.1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedclamavbefore 1.5.4-1.11.5.4-1.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5clamavbefore 1.5.4-150400.13.11.11.5.4-150400.13.11.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7clamavbefore 1.5.4-150600.18.31.11.5.4-150600.18.31.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSSclamavbefore 1.5.4-3.59.11.5.4-3.59.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0clamavbefore 1.5.4-160000.1.11.5.4-160000.1.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-20290A vulnerability in the OLE2 file format parser of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS)…
    40Plan
  • CVE-2023-20212A vulnerability in the AutoIt module of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition…
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2023-20197A vulnerability in the filesystem image parser for Hierarchical File System Plus (HFS+) of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote…
    30Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2023-20084Nov 22, 2023 · A vulnerability in the endpoint software of Cisco Secure Endpoint for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to evade…
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
azl3 clamav 1.5.3-1 on Azure Linux 3.01.5.4-1 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
alpine:clamav1.4.6-r0 · Alpine:v3.24Package registry (OSV)
debian:clamav1.4.6+dfsg-0+deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:clamav1.4.6+dfsg-1 · Debian:14Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:clamav1.5.4-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
suse:clamav1.5.4-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Fixed

c
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {  return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records