Cisco Unified Communications Manager Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability
A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write files to the underlying operating system that could be used later to elevate to root. Note: Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of Critical rather than High as the score indicates. The reason is that exploitation of this vulnerability could result in an attacker elevating privileges to root. Note: To exploit this vulnerability, the WebDialer service must be enabled. WebDialer is disabled by default.
- Published
- Jun 3, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 22, 2026
- EPSS
- 88.2% · 100th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
90
Now
Patch today or shut off access.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 30 / 30 · Listed
- EPSS
- 26 / 30 · 88.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- active
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · cisco
- 8.6
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Actively exploited in the wild
CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Jun 25, 2026. That signals real attacks, not theory.
Remediation deadline for government agencies: Jun 28, 2026.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | unified communications manager | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_communications_manager |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco unified communications manager14.0 and later · before 14su6
- cisco unified communications manager15.0 and later · up to 15su4a inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco Unified Communications Manager
- 14, 14SU1, 14SU2, 14SU3, 15, 15SU1, 14SU4, 14SU4a, 15SU1a, 15SU2, 15.0.1.13010-1, 15.0.1.13011-1 … (+10)affected
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-20045Cisco Unified Communications Products Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV70This week
- CVE-2024-20253A vulnerability in multiple Cisco Unified Communications and Contact Center Solutions products could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack41Plan
- CVE-2011-1643Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x, 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5(1)su2 and Cisco Un41Plan
- CVE-2025-20309Cisco Unified Communications Manager Static SSH Credentials Vulnerability40Plan
- CVE-2011-1609SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x before 6.1(5)su2, 7.x before 7.1(5)40Plan
- CVE-2007-4634Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Cisco CallManager and Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) before 3.3(5)sr2b, 4.1 before 4.1(3)sr38Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×3
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-06-05 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-06-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-06-25 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+1 d
- CISA KEV+21 d
- TodaySep 29, 2026+118 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cucm-ssrf-cXPnHcW
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20230
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.