Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

CVE-2026-1961: Forman: foreman: remote code execution via command injection in websocket proxy

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)

  • Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 80% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: foreman (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat; foreman-debug (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat; foreman-pcp (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to foreman (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat; foreman-debug (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat; foreman-pcp (Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8) 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A flaw was found in Foreman. A remote attacker could exploit a command injection vulnerability in Foreman's WebSocket proxy implementation. This vulnerability arises from the system's use of unsanitized hostname values from compute resource providers when constructing shell commands. By operating a malicious compute resource server, an attacker could achieve remote code execution on the Foreman server when a user accesses VM VNC console functionality. This could lead to the compromise of sensitive credentials and the entire managed infrastructure.

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.1—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Updated
Nov 3, 2026
EPSS
1.9% · 80th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

36

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 1.9%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
8.8
CNA · redhat
8.0
0.8 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-1961

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
redhatsatellite
redhatenterprise linux
theforemanforeman

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • redhat satellite6.17 and later · before 6.17.7
  • redhat satellite6.18 and later · before 6.18.4
  • redhat satellite6.16 and later · before 6.16.7
  • redhat satellite6.0
  • theforeman foreman3.17.0 and later · before 3.17.2
  • theforeman foremanbefore 3.16.3
  • theforeman foreman3.18.0 and later · before 3.18.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6

    • all versionsaffected
  • Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8

    • 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9

    • 0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9

    • 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pc and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:4.2.28-0.1.el9pc and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:2.22.3-1.el9pc and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:3.27.10-2.el9pc and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:1.5.1-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:0.4.3-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:4.16.0.14-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:0.13.0-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9

    • 0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat and laternot affected · rpm

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8foremanbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8foreman-debugbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8foreman-pcpbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python-brotlibefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python-brotli-debugsourcebefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python-djangobefore 0:4.2.28-0.1.el8pc0:4.2.28-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python3.11-brotlibefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python3.11-brotli-debuginfobefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8python3.11-djangobefore 0:4.2.28-0.1.el8pc0:4.2.28-0.1.el8pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el8rubygem-rubyipmibefore 0:0.13.0-0.1.el8sat0:0.13.0-0.1.el8sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el9foremanbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el9foreman-debugbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el9foreman-pcpbefore 0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.16::el9rubygem-rubyipmibefore 0:0.13.0-0.1.el9sat0:0.13.0-0.1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9foremanbefore 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9foreman-debugbefore 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9foreman-pcpbefore 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sat
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9libcompsbefore 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9libcomps-debuginfobefore 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9libcomps-debugsourcebefore 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9python-brotlibefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9python-brotli-debugsourcebefore 0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pc0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9python-djangobefore 0:4.2.28-0.1.el9pc0:4.2.28-0.1.el9pc
Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.17::el9python-pulp-containerbefore 0:2.22.3-1.el9pc0:2.22.3-1.el9pc

+75

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2019-10137A path traversal flaw was found in spacewalk-proxy, all versions through 2.9, in the way the proxy processes cached client tokens.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2024-7923Puppet-pulpcore: an authentication bypass vulnerability exists in pulpcore
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2024-7012Puppet-foreman: an authentication bypass vulnerability exists in foreman
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-3716Jun 5, 2024 · Foreman-installer: candlepin database password being leaked to local users via the process list
    24Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-0980Feb 27, 2026 · Rubyipmi: red hat satellite: remote code execution in rubyipmi via malicious bmc username
    35Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-9073Jun 23, 2026 · Foreman-mcp-server: mcp server: insecure sensitive http header sanitization
    24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
red hat:foreman0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-cli0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite_utils:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-debug0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-dynflow-sidekiq0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-ec20:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-journald0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-libvirt0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-openstack0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:foreman-pcp0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-foreman_kubevirt0:0.4.3-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-rubyipmi0:0.13.0-1.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite_capsule:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)
red hat:yggdrasil-worker-forwarder0:0.0.3-4.el9sat · Red Hat:satellite:6.18::el9Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-09-17

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+174 d
  3. TodayNov 8, 2026+227 d

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-098027 days apartRubyipmi: red hat satellite: remote code execution in rubyipmi via malicious bmc username
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2026-12540189 days apartForeman: command injection in foreman-rake errors:fetch_log via request_id parameter
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-12541189 days apartForeman: command injection in foreman-rake database tasks
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-12542189 days apartForeman: command injection in foreman-tail
    31Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

Fixed

ts
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Change log

  1. CVSS8 → 8.8
  2. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records