CVE-2026-19127: Insufficient verification of lifetime-deal redemption codes allows forgery of permanent paid subscriptions
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: GitroomHQ postiz-app 2.21.10.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to GitroomHQ postiz-app 2.21.10 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An issue in the billing and license activation subsystem allows remote attackers to bypass payment authorization workflows. By exploiting insufficient cryptographic validation or lack of server-side state verification on promotional/lifetime-deal (LTD) redemption codes, an unauthenticated attacker can forge valid redemption tokens or replay existing single-use codes to activate permanent, tier-highest paid subscriptions without a financial transaction.
- Published
- Aug 6, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 23th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-345
Report tools
Action score
26
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · postiz
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (postiz). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GitroomHQ postiz-app
- before 2.21.10affected · semver
Same product
gitroomhq: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-115933Forged signed tokens let any registered user take over other users and organizations39Monitor
- CVE-2026-115931Arbitrary file read and backend crash through unrestricted provider method calls39Monitor
- CVE-2026-48781Postiz has cross-tenant SUPERADMIN takeover via Skool-provider JWT forgery39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-48783Jun 17, 2026 · Postiz has an unauthenticated billing-enforcement bypass via /public/modify-subscription19Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-48799Jul 15, 2026 · Postiz: Unauthenticated arbitrary lifetime PRO grant via Nowpayments webhook30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-19264Aug 7, 2026 · Unauthenticated arbitrary file read via /uploads path traversal (URL-encoded separators) leading to instance takeover37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GitroomHQ postiz-app | 2.21.10 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Enno Gelhausreporter
- Nevo Davidremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-4879922 days apartPostiz: Unauthenticated arbitrary lifetime PRO grant via Nowpayments webhook30Monitor
- CVE-2026-4878350 days apartPostiz has an unauthenticated billing-enforcement bypass via /public/modify-subscription19Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-345 · Insufficient Verification of Data AuthenticityCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)CAPEC-111likelihood: High · High
- Cache PoisoningCAPEC-141likelihood: High · High
- DNS Cache PoisoningCAPEC-142likelihood: High · High
- Content SpoofingCAPEC-148likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML MessagesCAPEC-218Medium
- Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-MiddleCAPEC-384Low
- Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API ManipulationCAPEC-385Medium
- Application API Navigation RemappingCAPEC-386Medium
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.