CVE-2026-18963: Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 38/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB, GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 6.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 93.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: org.keycloak:keycloak-services (Maven) 26.4.15, 26.6.6, 26.7.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to org.keycloak:keycloak-services (Maven) 26.4.15, 26.6.6, 26.7.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in the reset-credentials flow of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity and access management in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the password reset process for any user without needing to click the required email verification link. This can result in the attacker gaining full control over target user accounts by directly setting new credentials.
- Published
- Aug 18, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 6.5% · 93th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-640
Report tools
Action score
38
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 6.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 9.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4
- 26.4.15-1 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.4-23 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.4-23 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.15
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6
- 26.6.6-1 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.6-12 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.6-12 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.6
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Single Sign-On 7
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.keycloak:keycloak-services | from 26.0.0 · before 26.4.15 | 26.4.15 |
| Maven | org.keycloak:keycloak-services | from 26.5.0 · before 26.6.6 | 26.6.6 |
| Maven | org.keycloak:keycloak-services | from 26.7.0 · before 26.7.2 | 26.7.2 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-1486Org.keycloak.protocol.oidc.grants: disabled identity providers are still accepted for jwt authorization grant35Monitor
- CVE-2026-74909Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: incomplete fix for cve-2026-15573 allows policy enforcer bypass via percent-encoded uri segments32Monitor
- CVE-2026-79651Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: unauthenticated dos via unbounded locale caching30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-2733Feb 19, 2026 · Org.keycloak/keycloak-services: keycloak: missing check on disabled client for docker registry protocol15Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-9088Jun 5, 2026 · Keycloak: keycloak: information disclosure due to user profile permission bypass10Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-19729Sep 9, 2026 · Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: incomplete fix for arbitrary filesystem path probing via keystore parameters19Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 26.4.15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 26.6.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 26.7.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
- Nuclei detection template ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×17
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2026-10-21 |
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2026-18963 | — |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:15 | 2026-08-20 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:45 | 2026-08-20 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-08-24 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:4 | 2026-08-24 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:20 | 2026-08-24 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:17 | 2026-08-25 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-08-25 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-08-25 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-08-25 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:4 | 2026-08-27 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+1 d
- TodayNov 11, 2026+84 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-640 · Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten PasswordCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.