CVE-2026-18922: 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: sasl plain authentication allows privilege escalation to directory manager via stale identity in cyrus sasl auxiliary property
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.56% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: 389-ds-base (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2; 389-ds-base-bdb (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2; 389-ds-base-devel (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to 389-ds-base (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2; 389-ds-base-bdb (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2; 389-ds-base-devel (AlmaLinux:10) 3.2.0-10.el10_2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, a stale identity carried in a Cyrus SASL auxiliary property from a prior failed bind attempt can be installed on a connection following a subsequent, unrelated successful bind, regardless of which SASL mechanism completes that second bind. An attacker can send a SASL PLAIN bind as cn=Directory Manager with an incorrect password, then complete a SASL ANONYMOUS bind on the same connection, causing the server to grant Directory Manager authority without any valid credentials. A variant using a valid low-privileged account's own successful bind instead of an anonymous one is also possible.
- EUVD-2026-72457
- ALSA-2026:64784
- ALSA-2026:64785
- ALSA-2026:64791
- openSUSE-SU-2026:11739-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21950-1
- RHSA-2026:64771
- RHSA-2026:64776
- RHSA-2026:64778
- RHSA-2026:64779
- RHSA-2026:64780
- RHSA-2026:64781
- RHSA-2026:64783
- RHSA-2026:64784
- RHSA-2026:64785
- RHSA-2026:64789
- RHSA-2026:64790
- RHSA-2026:64791
- RHSA-2026:64792
- RHSA-2026:64793
- Published
- Sep 7, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 8, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 46th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 9.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.5 E4S for RHEL 8
- 8060020260908152739.0ca98e7e and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.7 E4S for RHEL 8
- 8080020260903102346.f969626e and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.9 for RHEL 8
- 8100020260904171440.37ed7c03 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.2 E4S for RHEL 9
- 9020020260903155914.1674d574 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.4 E4S for RHEL 9
- 9040020260903102623.1674d574 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 13
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:3.2.0-10.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
- 0:3.0.6-21.el10_0 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION
- 0:1.2.11.15-97.el6_10.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
- 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 8100020260904155442.25e700aa and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | 389-ds-base | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | 389-ds-base-bdb | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | 389-ds-base-libs | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | 389-ds-base-snmp | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | python3-lib389 | before 3.2.0-10.el10_2 | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-legacy-tools | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-libs | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-snmp | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3-lib389 | before 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base | before 2.8.0-10.el9_8 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 2.8.0-10.el9_8 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base-libs | before 2.8.0-10.el9_8 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base-snmp | before 2.8.0-10.el9_8 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | python3-lib389 | before 2.8.0-10.el9_8 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 |
| Debian:12 | 389-ds-base | from 0 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | 389-ds | before 3.0.7~git2.2846d5288-160000.1.1 | 3.0.7~git2.2846d5288-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | 389-ds | before 3.3.1+8c2711bd6-1.1 | 3.3.1+8c2711bd6-1.1 |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base | before 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 | 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-debuginfo | before 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 | 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-debugsource | before 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 | 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 | 0:1.4.3.34-9.module+el8dsrv+24847+c94540a6 |
+96
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-19843389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: command injection via unescaped ldap dn in cockpit 389 console ldap editor33Monitor
- CVE-2026-18453389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication null pointer dereference via paged results and use_one_backend control in op_shared_search30Monitor
- CVE-2026-18355389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via sasl wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet()30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-76560Sep 7, 2026 · 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous ldap client can defeat selfdn aci bind-rule checks via empty bind dn30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:389-ds-base | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-bdb | 3.2.0-10.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-devel | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-legacy-tools | 1.4.3.39-28.module_el8.10.0+4274+00f9a3f1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-libs | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-snmp | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-lib389 | 2.8.0-10.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:389-ds | 3.3.1+8c2711bd6-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base | 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-debuginfo | 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-debugsource | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-devel | 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-legacy-tools | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-legacy-tools-debuginfo | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-libs | 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-libs-debuginfo | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-snmp | 0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-snmp-debuginfo | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cockpit-389-ds | 0:2.2.7-18.module+el9dsrv+24814+6d9b6eb5 · Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:12.2::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-lib389 | 0:1.4.3.35-21.module+el8.8.0+24788+bed99f90 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:389-ds-base | 0:2.8.0-10.el9_8 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:389-ds | 2.8.2~git10.030ada7a6-150700.3.25.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:389-ds | 3.0.7~git2.2846d5288-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-198430 days apart389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: command injection via unescaped ldap dn in cockpit 389 console ldap editor33Monitor
- CVE-2026-183550 days apart389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via sasl wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet()30Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middleware
app.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();
admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);
app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (18 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64776
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64778
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64779
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64780
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64781
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64783
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64784
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64785
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64789
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64790
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64791
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64792
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64793
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64804
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:64811
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:79217
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18922
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511388
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.