IBM i is Affected By An Improper Authentication Vulnerability in SST / DST
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.26% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication.
- Published
- Oct 16, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · ibm
- 4.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IBM i
- 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, 7.3affected
Same product
ibm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-18193IBM i Is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in IBM Java SDK and IBM Java Runtime40Plan
- CVE-2026-96119IBM i is Affected By An Improper Control of Code Generation Vulnerability in HTTP Server Administration GUI39Monitor
- CVE-2026-18221IBM i is Affected By Improper Authorization and Authentication Vulnerabilities in DDM / DRDA [, ]39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-17073Oct 16, 2026 · IBM i is Affected By Improper Authorization and Access Control Vulnerabilities in Network File System21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-17275Oct 16, 2026 · IBM i is Affected by an Improper Validation Vulnerability14Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-17491Oct 16, 2026 · IBM i is Affected By An Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability in OpenSSH21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1822142 days apartIBM i is Affected By Improper Authorization and Authentication Vulnerabilities in DDM / DRDA [, ]39Monitor
- CVE-2026-1719764 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers39Monitor
- CVE-2026-1686764 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in NetServer39Monitor
- CVE-2026-1710164 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Navigator for i38Monitor
- CVE-2026-1707564 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Digital Certificate Manager32Monitor
- CVE-2026-1709964 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Navigator for i29Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-961193 days apartIBM i is Affected By An Improper Control of Code Generation Vulnerability in HTTP Server Administration GUI39Monitor
- CVE-2026-1886928 days apartIBM i is Affected By Denial of Service and Security Restriction Bypass Vulnerabilities in FTP [, ]25Monitor
- CVE-2026-938863 days apartIBM i is Affected By An Improper Neutralization of Input Vulnerability in HTTP Server Administration GUI21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1851532 days apartIBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Navigator for i and Digital Certificate Manager for i.17Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middlewareapp.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.