Amelia < 2.4.6 - Provider+ Cross-Customer Appointment Data Disclosure via IDOR
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 14/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: Unknown Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar 2.4.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Unknown Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar 2.4.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.6 does not verify that an authenticated employee (provider) is assigned to the appointment being accessed, allowing any employee to read any appointment by its identifier and disclose the booked customer's personal data.
- Published
- Aug 13, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
14
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 14 / 40 · 3.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Is Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia on your site?
WP Lens reads your site's plugin, theme and WordPress versions from the outside and matches them to known vulnerabilities. Works without an account.
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (WPScan). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Unknown Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar
- before 2.4.6affected · semver
Same product
unknown: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-77705Amelia < 2.4.10 - Amelia Manager+ WordPress Account Takeover28Monitor
- CVE-2026-14215Amelia < 2.4.9 - Unauthenticated Post-Booking Action Trigger26Monitor
- CVE-2026-14216Amelia < 2.4.7 - Unauthenticated Notification Queue Dispatch26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-14214Aug 1, 2026 · Amelia < 2.4.4 - Amelia Manager+ Arbitrary User-Field Modification via Mass Assignment10Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-14211Aug 10, 2026 · Amelia Pro < 9.7 - Provider+ Arbitrary Customer Data Disclosure and Modification via IDOR15Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-14212Aug 26, 2026 · Amelia Pro < 9.8 - Provider+ Arbitrary Provider Password Update via IDOR18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar | 2.4.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Muni Nitish Kumar Yaddalafinder
- WPScancoordinator
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-7770530 days apartAmelia < 2.4.10 - Amelia Manager+ WordPress Account Takeover28Monitor
- CVE-2026-1421213 days apartAmelia Pro < 9.8 - Provider+ Arbitrary Provider Password Update via IDOR18Monitor
- CVE-2026-142113 days apartAmelia Pro < 9.7 - Provider+ Arbitrary Customer Data Disclosure and Modification via IDOR15Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.