CVE-2026-126626: Overly Restrictive Account Lockout Mechanism in hMailServer
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.52% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The web services listener of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.3 through 6.3.7 counts every failed CardDAV, CalDAV or Autodiscover sign-in from a proxy it trusts - one on the same machine, or one named in WebServicesTrustedProxies, whose X-Forwarded-Proto it believes - against the proxy's own address, which allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who can reach the proxy to have that address banned from the server's mail listeners. The listener, off by default (WebServicesHttpPort and WebServicesHttpsPort 0), signs an account in with HTTP Basic over HTTPS for CardDAV from 6.3.3 and for CalDAV and Outlook Autodiscover from 6.3.4. Behind a TLS-terminating proxy, which the server trusts when it is on the same machine or named in WebServicesTrustedProxies, the listener takes the client's HTTPS from the proxy's X-Forwarded-Proto header, but it does not believe X-Forwarded-For and sees the proxy's address for every client. Each failed sign-in counted towards the auto-ban against that address, so that failed sign-ins through the proxy from anybody, under any user name, reaching MaxInvalidLogonAttempts (3 within 30 minutes by default) wrote an IP range that refused the proxy's address at the SMTP, POP3, IMAP and ManageSieve listeners for AutoBanMinutes (60 by default), and could write it again each time it lapsed. For a proxy on the same machine that address is the loopback address, so that a webmail on that machine, local scripts that submit mail and the other local clients of the mail listeners were shut out; for a proxy at another address that also carries mail, every mail client behind it was. Such a proxy forwarding to the listener's HTTPS port, re-encrypting, was counted against in the same way, and listing it in WebServicesTrustedProxies did not spare it. The auto-ban is on by default and AutoBanNeverBan, which spares an address, is empty by default; the listener itself went on serving the proxy.
- Published
- Nov 11, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 12, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 44th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-645
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitLab
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitLab). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Progressive Robot Ltd hMailServer
- 6.3.3 and later · up to and including 6.3.7affected · semver
Same product
progressive robot ltd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-100741Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') in hMailServer40Plan
- CVE-2026-126617Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in hMailServer35Monitor
- CVE-2026-114489Missing Authorization in hMailServer32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-126623Nov 11, 2026 · Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServer30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-126624Nov 11, 2026 · Unverified Ownership in hMailServer29Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-126625Nov 11, 2026 · Incorrect Default Permissions in hMailServer26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-645 · Overly Restrictive Account Lockout MechanismCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
Change log (1)
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.